2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-80453-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic signature of lung adenocarcinoma based on stem cell-related genes

Abstract: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is characterized by high infiltration and rapid growth. The function of the stem cell population is to control and maintain cell regeneration. Therefore, it is necessary to study the prognostic value of stem cell-related genes in LUAD. Signature genes were screened out from 166 stem cell-related genes according to the least absolute shrinkage operator (LASSO) and subsequently multivariate Cox regression analysis, and then established risk model. Immune infiltration and nomogram model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, our EMT-associated gene signature was assessed by comparing with 2 other identified signatures: a 9-gene recurrence-associated signature 31 and a 10-gene prognostic signature. 32 The risk scores of each sample from the combined cohort of GSE31210 and GSE50081 were calculated using their formulas respectively ( Supplemental Table S7 ) and were subsequently used for the following analyses. The ROC curve of the 5-year recurrence prediction shows that our 5-gene signature demonstrated better performance than the 9-gene recurrence-associated signature ( Figure 7B , AUC = 0.781 vs AUC = 0.633, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, our EMT-associated gene signature was assessed by comparing with 2 other identified signatures: a 9-gene recurrence-associated signature 31 and a 10-gene prognostic signature. 32 The risk scores of each sample from the combined cohort of GSE31210 and GSE50081 were calculated using their formulas respectively ( Supplemental Table S7 ) and were subsequently used for the following analyses. The ROC curve of the 5-year recurrence prediction shows that our 5-gene signature demonstrated better performance than the 9-gene recurrence-associated signature ( Figure 7B , AUC = 0.781 vs AUC = 0.633, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer stem cell, which is a small and rare subset of cells with stem cell-like characteristics, plays an important role in tumor proliferation, metastasis, and recurrence [ 22 ]. To observe the difference of stem cell infiltration between the two groups, we made a comparative analysis at the DNA and RNA levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, these genes were not closely related to tumor metastasis or recurrence, which suggests that these gene signatures may fail in predicting the OS rate and recurrence-free survival of LUAD patients. So we compare our signature with two other signatures, which are constructed by glycolysis-related genes [33] and stem cell-related genes [34]. As expected, the signature constructed by EMT-related genes has a better stability and accuracy in predicting the OS of LUAD patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Comparison with other signatures of LUAD: There are some already published prognostic signatures for lung adenocarcinoma, but the genes they used to build the model were not so strongly associated with cancer development, and they didn't compare it with other signature. Therefore, We calculate the risk scores of patients in the two additional databases, GSE30219 and GSE31210 [32], using the method applied in this paper and the method mentioned in Liu et al [33] and Huang et al [34], respectively. It can be clearly seen from the results that the signature constructed in this paper has a better prediction effect, while the signature in Liu et al only has a good predict performance in GSE31210 data set, and the signature in Huang et al has a poor predict performance in both data sets (Supplementary Figure 2).…”
Section: Clinical Characteristics Of Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%