1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80283-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of immunologic changes in 675 infants perinatally exposed to human immunodeficiency virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
31
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Data in children are missing as bone marrow aspirates are not done routinely in HIV-infected children. Hypergammaglobulinemia for IgG, IgA, IgM in HIV-infected children has been reported (10,11,29). In contrast, we only observed an increased IgG level in HIV-infected children compared with reference values.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Data in children are missing as bone marrow aspirates are not done routinely in HIV-infected children. Hypergammaglobulinemia for IgG, IgA, IgM in HIV-infected children has been reported (10,11,29). In contrast, we only observed an increased IgG level in HIV-infected children compared with reference values.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Since Ig levels vary with age, differences at different age periods were evaluated through differences in z-scores. Means and standard deviations for the normal population for each age period were calculated using values from a previous study by de Martino and colleagues [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection started on 1 June 1985. Information concerning data collection has been described in detail elsewhere [2,9,10]. Data are prospectively collected every 6-12 months.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of pediatric HIV infection, the principal immunologic change documented in large, multicenter, longitudinal studies has been the CD4 T-lymphocyte count, which decreased rapidly in infected infants and children [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] compared with that in HIV-exposed (but HIV-noninfected) control subjects. [15][16][17][18][19] Use of these control subjects was justified on the basis of their lack of apparent HIV infection and with the assumption that their immune systems resembled those of absolute control subjects (children without HIV exposure and HIV infection).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%