2016
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression and its association with mutant p53 expression in high-risk endometrial cancer

Abstract: Studies in early-stage, predominantly low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer have demonstrated that L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) overexpression identifies patients at increased risk of recurrence, yet its prognostic significance in high-risk endometrial cancer is unclear. To evaluate this, its frequency, and the relationship of L1CAM with the established endometrial cancer biomarker p53, we analyzed the expression of both markers by immunohistochemistry in a pilot series of 116 endometrial cancers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
72
4
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
12
72
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several studies have been performed using the Cancer Genome Atlas Research network. 32,33 A large-scale retrospective study of approximately 1200 cases showed that L1 cell adhesion molecule is a strong prognostic factor for endometrial cancer. 33 Deubiquitinating enzymes have been reported to be involved in differentiation and proliferation in several cancer tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies have been performed using the Cancer Genome Atlas Research network. 32,33 A large-scale retrospective study of approximately 1200 cases showed that L1 cell adhesion molecule is a strong prognostic factor for endometrial cancer. 33 Deubiquitinating enzymes have been reported to be involved in differentiation and proliferation in several cancer tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16 One study has shown that expression of L1CAM and p53 are strongly, but not universally associated, and both markers are therefore valuable prognostic markers. 17 A study including ER, PR, and L1CAM has not yet been conducted, and their added value to the currently used prognostic models and to each other is not yet known. The aim of this study therefore is to analyze the relationship between these 3 markers and to analyze the combined value of ER, PR, and L1CAM in predicting recurrent disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 11 studies [7, 13, 16, 21, 26, 29, 30, 37, 38, 40, 42] estimated the prognostic value of L1CAM expression on PFS/RFS. Consistent with the above results, significantly shorter PFS/RFS was observed in cancer patients expressing high levels of L1CAM (pooled HR=2.07, 95%CI 1.41-3.05, p<0.001) (Figure 3B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%