2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
196
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
196
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(25), found that high PD-L1 protein expression was associated with shorter survival which was like our reults.PD-L1 expression in malignant cells is a recent prognostic marker that could prove the antitumor immunity interruption .Previous studies proved that PD-L1 overexpression was an important prognostic factor in malignancies of many organs (26) . PD-L1 overexpression and relations to patient prognosis differ according to cancer type (27).…”
Section: Hamanishi Et Al 2007(16)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…(25), found that high PD-L1 protein expression was associated with shorter survival which was like our reults.PD-L1 expression in malignant cells is a recent prognostic marker that could prove the antitumor immunity interruption .Previous studies proved that PD-L1 overexpression was an important prognostic factor in malignancies of many organs (26) . PD-L1 overexpression and relations to patient prognosis differ according to cancer type (27).…”
Section: Hamanishi Et Al 2007(16)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…PD-L1 expression was associated with triple-negative tumors, higher grade and size, node positivity and a worse prognosis. Still, another immunohistochemistry study examining both PD-L1 and PD-L2 in 192 stage I to III breast cancer patients showed 56.6% and 50.8% to be positive, respectively, and confirmed that positive tumors were more often ER-negative and lymph node-positive (26). Unexpectedly, despite a higher distant recurrence rate in PD-L1 positive patients, their overall survival was better than PD-L1-negative patients, a fact that the authors attributed to a stronger underlying anti-tumor immune response leading to the observed PD-L1 positivity (26).…”
Section: Ctla-4mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…PD-1 interacts with two known ligands: PD-L1 and PD-L2 (Latchman et al 2001). PD-L1 expression was initially reported on melanoma, ovarian, colon and lung cancer cells (Dong et al 2002) but can also be found in other human cancers such as breast (Baptista et al 2016), head and neck (Malm et al 2015) and pancreatic cancer (Bigelow et al 2013). Interaction of PD-1 with PD-L1 has been conceived to act as an immune evasion mechanism for tumor cells (Dong et al 2002, Iwai et al 2002, Wu et al 2006.…”
Section: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: the Milestone In Immunooncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD-L2 is upregulated in follicular B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (Rosenwald et al 2003). Recent research could also identify an overexpression of PD-L2 in more than 50% of breast cancer samples (Baptista et al 2016) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma but no correlation was found with disease-free survival and/or overall survival (Leng et al 2016). So far, no therapeutics directly target PD-L2.…”
Section: :10mentioning
confidence: 99%