2022
DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value and clinicopathological correlation of the tumor regression grade in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and radical gastrectomy are the gold standard treatments for resectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the prognostic value of the pathological tumor regression grade (TRG) of NACT remains controversial. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between the TRG after NACT and clinicopathological features as well as its prognostic value in advanced GC. Methods: In total, 551 patients with GC who received NACT combined with surgical resectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected a total of 92 patients whose pathological findings included tumor regression grade (TRG). According to the Mandard TRG criteria, marked TRG 1–3 as a good pathological response was contrasted with TRG 4 or 5 as a poor pathological response [ 30 ]. 47.82% (44/92) of patients were assessed as TRG 1 (pathological complete response, pCR), 14.13% (13/92) as TRG 2, 16.30% (15/92) as TRG 3, 15.22% (14/92) as TRG 4, and 5.43% (6/92) as TRG 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected a total of 92 patients whose pathological findings included tumor regression grade (TRG). According to the Mandard TRG criteria, marked TRG 1–3 as a good pathological response was contrasted with TRG 4 or 5 as a poor pathological response [ 30 ]. 47.82% (44/92) of patients were assessed as TRG 1 (pathological complete response, pCR), 14.13% (13/92) as TRG 2, 16.30% (15/92) as TRG 3, 15.22% (14/92) as TRG 4, and 5.43% (6/92) as TRG 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For digestive cancers, including GC, but not for stage IV cancers, Tao Wan et al concluded that pCR correlates with favorable survival outcomes compared to non-pCR after surgery following chemotherapy [ 14 ]. Furthermore, for patients who successfully underwent surgery after chemotherapy, achieving pCR emerged as an independent prognostic factor, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 70.9%, surpassing the 48.8% OS of patients who did not achieve pCR after conversion surgery [ 15 ]. TRG (tumor regression grade (TRG) could also be an independent prognostic factor affecting the OS of GC patients [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for patients who successfully underwent surgery after chemotherapy, achieving pCR emerged as an independent prognostic factor, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 70.9%, surpassing the 48.8% OS of patients who did not achieve pCR after conversion surgery [ 15 ]. TRG (tumor regression grade (TRG) could also be an independent prognostic factor affecting the OS of GC patients [ 15 ]. These results suggest that even if chemotherapy is not completely effective, a greater efficacy is still associated with better prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is currently no unified standard for evaluating neoadjuvant treatment response and many authors have proposed various methods, including pathological tumor regression assessed by the TRG system, radiological tumor regression according to RECIST version 1.1 and serum tumor marker [ 5 , 6 , 13 ]. A retrospective study conducted by Wang et al found that TRG (P = 0.042, HR = 1.65) was an independent prognostic factor affecting the OS of GC patients, and patients who had a pathological response to NAT had a better prognosis [ 14 ]. Pietro et al analyzed 67 LAGC patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy and found that clinical response was a prognostic factor for both OS and DFS (OS:P = 0.003; DFS: P = 0.003) [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%