2015
DOI: 10.1179/1754762815y.0000000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation

Abstract: Implant electrical stimulation and brain stem recordings can be used (eABRs wave V) to predict a negative functional outcome. Low-frequency waves V were observed in all patients with successful CI outcomes. Patients for whom eABR waveforms were completely absent had unsuccessful CI outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the auditory brainstem response (ABR) is monitored in a hearing sparing approach for resection, a delay in latency and reduction in amplitude in wave V can predict cochlear nerve damage and portends a poor CI functional outcome. 35 This could be taken into account if a delayed CI placement is being considered with a poor hearing outcome following resection. An electrical ABR can be used in a translabyrinthine approach because of the accessibility of the cochlea and it has been shown to correlate with CI outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the auditory brainstem response (ABR) is monitored in a hearing sparing approach for resection, a delay in latency and reduction in amplitude in wave V can predict cochlear nerve damage and portends a poor CI functional outcome. 35 This could be taken into account if a delayed CI placement is being considered with a poor hearing outcome following resection. An electrical ABR can be used in a translabyrinthine approach because of the accessibility of the cochlea and it has been shown to correlate with CI outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the age at implantation can be as low as 1 year of age, developing objective markers is important for assessing pediatric CI users and candidates who have unreliable behavioral responses. Currently used objective measures such as the stapedius reflex, electrically evoked compound action potentials, and electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses have shown poor correlation with speech perception (Abbas and Brown, 1991;Hirschfelder et al, 2012;Lundin et al, 2015). Unlike these peripheral measures, cortical activity measured at the sensory and source levels has nevertheless shown some reliable relationships with behavioral performance in adult CI users in research settings (Han et al, 2016;Gransier et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a biomarker is even more important for pediatric CI users whose speech perception may not be easily evaluated by behavioral measures. However, currently used objective measures such as the stapedius reflex, electrically evoked compound action potentials, or electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses have shown poor relationships with speech perception (Abbas and Brown, 1991; Hirschfelder et al, 2012; Lundin et al, 2015). Among demographical factors, the duration of deafness has been correlated with the speech perception abilities of CI users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%