1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00885662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Program evaluation in community psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of its strengths was that the author was invited to make the evaluation by a programme team whose members were aware of the benefits of evaluation and who were prepared to channel some precious financial resources towards it. As Spielberger, Piacente and Hobfoll (1976) pointed out, a positive environment for cooperation in programme evaluation is very important. One of its weaknesses, on the other hand, was that their full PROFAM programme was rarely implemented so that it could not be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of its strengths was that the author was invited to make the evaluation by a programme team whose members were aware of the benefits of evaluation and who were prepared to channel some precious financial resources towards it. As Spielberger, Piacente and Hobfoll (1976) pointed out, a positive environment for cooperation in programme evaluation is very important. One of its weaknesses, on the other hand, was that their full PROFAM programme was rarely implemented so that it could not be evaluated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State anxiety is defined by Spielberger (1976) as a temporary, transient experience of conscious, unpleasant feelings of tension and fears. State anxiety is a result of the encounter between demands and the individual (the possessor of resources), reflecting a loss in areas of life important to the individual (e.g.…”
Section: Loss Of Resources -Unemployment and Immigrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The State Anxiety Questionnaire (Spielberger, 1976) is theoretically based and structurally valid, suitable for field use, and easy to circulate and evaluate. It is composed of two subscales: a State Anxiety Scale and a Trait Anxiety Scale.…”
Section: State Anxiety Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are, in the formulation discussed in Spielberger, Piacente, and Hobfoll (1976), for the administrator concerned about receiving feedback that permits adjustments in ongoing programs. They are, in the formulation discussed in Spielberger, Piacente, and Hobfoll (1976), for the administrator concerned about receiving feedback that permits adjustments in ongoing programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideas presented here are based on the author's experiences in dealing with community mental health centers and are intended for administrators who are concerned with the efficiency of their programs. They are, in the formulation discussed in Spielberger, Piacente, and Hobfoll (1976), for the administrator concerned about receiving feedback that permits adjustments in ongoing programs. However, unlike many approaches to the program evaluation process, the techniques discussed here are concerned with assessing the operating efficiency of a program on a routine basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%