Adjunct Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3474349.3480198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmable Polarities: Actuating Interactive Prototypes with Programmable Electromagnets

Abstract: This demo introduces a framework that uses programmable electromagnets as a method to rapidly prototype interactive objects. Our approach allows users to to quickly and inexpensively embed actuation mechanisms into otherwise static prototypes in order to make them dynamic and interactive. Underpinning the technique is the insight of using electromagnets to interchangeably create attractive and repulsive forces between adjacent parts, and programmatically setting their polarities in a way that allows objects to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the field of non-actuated modular TUIs (e.g., [26,46,47,70,75]) can already benefits from our results, we cannot be sure how our results will apply to future actuated modules. Research in actuated modules currently explore electromagnetic [31,53] and electrostatic actuators [48,59]. As the technology advances and the size of actuators decreases, future work should replicate this study to verify that our results apply to actuated modules.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the field of non-actuated modular TUIs (e.g., [26,46,47,70,75]) can already benefits from our results, we cannot be sure how our results will apply to future actuated modules. Research in actuated modules currently explore electromagnetic [31,53] and electrostatic actuators [48,59]. As the technology advances and the size of actuators decreases, future work should replicate this study to verify that our results apply to actuated modules.…”
Section: Limitation Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We conduct the first study with passive magnets as bonding mechanism. Passive magnets -although not as strong as other alternatives, e.g., mechanical clamps [56] hinges [69], electromagnets [31,53]-are simple to use, and allow the modules to self-align [66]. Magnets help users to reconfigure UIs made of small scale modules, both in 2D (e.g., [26,45]) and in 3D (e.g., [66,75]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work could investigate the use of more strongly magnetizable materials to increase mating strength. These encodings could equivalently be used to build strong interfaces by replacing programmed pixels with arrangements of permanent magnets, and for active self-assembly using electromagnets [30] or electropermanent magnets whose encodings could be changed online. In addition, the programming step may be rapidly accelerated using parallel arrays of electromagnets to program every pixel simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic materials, however, still remain far behind this digital fabrication revolution [3] despite the fact that magnetic materials hold great promise for interactive applications. For example, researchers used magnets to create novel tangible interfaces (MechaMagnets [18]), to produce custom tactile sensations (MagneLayer [16]), to guide the assembly of 3D objects (DynaBlock [12], ElectroVoxel [6], Stochastic Self-assembly [5]), and to create actuated interfaces (Programmable Polarities [10]). However, all of these works either use of-the-shelf magnets (MechaMagnets [18], DynaBlock [12]) or require manual construction of the customized magnetic materials (FluxPaper [11], MagneLayer [16]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%