Silicone
and e-poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (e-PTFE) are the most
commonly used artificial materials for repairing maxillofacial bone
defects caused by facial trauma and tumors. However, their use is
limited by poor histocompatibility, unsatisfactory support, and high
infection rates. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has excellent mechanical
strength and biocompatibility, but its application to the repair of
maxillofacial bone defects lacks a theoretical basis. The microstructure
and mechanical properties of e-PTFE, silicone, and PEEK were evaluated
by electron microscopy, BOSE machine, and Fourier transformed infrared
spectroscopy. Mouse fibroblast L929 cells were incubated on the surface
of the three materials to assess cytotoxicity and adhesion. The three
materials were implanted onto the left femoral surface of 90 male
mice, and samples of the implants and surrounding soft tissues were
evaluated histologically at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-surgery.
PEEK had a much higher Young’s modulus than either e-PTFE or
silicone (p < 0.05 each), and maintained high
stiffness without degradation long after implantation. Both PEEK and
e-PTFE facilitated L929 cell adhesion, with PEEK having lower cytotoxicity
than e-PTFE and silicone (p < 0.05 each). All
three materials similarly hindered the motor function of mice 12 weeks
after implantation (p > 0.05 each). Connective
tissue
ingrowth was observed in PEEK and e-PTFE, whereas a fibrotic peri-prosthetic
capsule was observed on the surface of silicone. The postoperative
infection rate was significantly lower for both PEEK and silicone
than for e-PTFE (p < 0.05 each). PEEK shows excellent
biocompatibility and mechanical stability, suggesting that it can
be effective as a novel implant to repair maxillofacial bone defects.