2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
301
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 532 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 345 publications
3
301
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in the literature [41], the micromixing constant has a strong effect on RANS-PDF predictions, however it may not be so in LES due to considerably greater localization and reduced scalar variances. In this section the micro mixing effects are investigated in flame F2 with N=4.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis: Micromixingmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in the literature [41], the micromixing constant has a strong effect on RANS-PDF predictions, however it may not be so in LES due to considerably greater localization and reduced scalar variances. In this section the micro mixing effects are investigated in flame F2 with N=4.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis: Micromixingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The above time scale includes a molecular time scale, proportional to the diffusion coefficient (through µ), this fact combined with the molecular diffusion present in D e makes LES-PDF suitable for premix calculations. There are several alternative micromixing methods proposed mainly in the RANS context [40,41] however the increase in complexity and computational time required does not necessary guarantee improved predictions in LES context.…”
Section: Filtered Probability Density Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localized extinctions have been recently studied by Barlow et al [16] in piloted jet flames of CH 4 /H 2 /air, in comparable conditions. Accurate prediction of localized extinction is recognized as an important test of turbulent combustion models [17].…”
Section: Specific Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cause of this over-prediction may 341 be due to chemical mechanism validity range, since higher pressure and temperature are 342 found when increasing load. Also the lack of any turbulent-chemistry interaction model 343 may also contribute to this result [38]. Nevertheless, predicted in-cylinder pressure and 344…”
Section: Rcci Medium Load Operation 302mentioning
confidence: 99%