2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in screen-printed metallization of industrial solar cells with SiOx/poly-Si passivating contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main findings are in good agreement with other early investigations from our side [ 24 ] and other authors. [ 7,15,28–31 ] The comparison of both pastes for the same polysilicon thickness reveals that paste C forms a lower ohmic contact than paste F at T set = 840 °C firing, but at T set = 870 °C, the opposite holds true.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main findings are in good agreement with other early investigations from our side [ 24 ] and other authors. [ 7,15,28–31 ] The comparison of both pastes for the same polysilicon thickness reveals that paste C forms a lower ohmic contact than paste F at T set = 840 °C firing, but at T set = 870 °C, the opposite holds true.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the n‐type passivating contact has some physical and technical advantages over the p‐type counterpart such as passivation quality or a more straightforward metallization by screen‐printed silver pastes, [ 5 ] most TOPCon solar cells are fabricated on n‐type wafers. [ 6–11 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this study, a contact resistivity of 2.7 mΩ cm 2 is presented for an 80-150 nm thick n þ LPCVD-deposited polysilicon, with screen printing of partially fire through paste in the work of Chang et al [14] Articles from Padhamnath et al from SERIS also show excellent J 0met value below 50 fA cm À2 with excellent contact resistivity below 2 mΩ cm 2 for ex situ-doped LPCVDdeposited polysilicon layers on top of a thin thermal oxide. [15,16] The J 0met values in this work were generated from their in-house developed software. This requires contact resistivity, sheet resistance, and the PL images of screen-printed metallized samples as input to the software.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/pssa202100243mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We inspect selected samples with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after we remove the silver fingers completely. [ 6–9 ] For this, we etch the silver fingers in 69% nitric acid (HNO 3 ) at 95 °C for 10 min. Subsequently, etching in 5% hydrofluoric (HF) acid at room temperature for 5 min removes the interfacial glass layer.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was reported that the screen-printed silver paste attacks the poly-Si layer during the firing step and deteriorates the passivation quality of polysilicon on oxide (POLO) contacts significantly. [6][7][8] This effect can be reduced by changing the chemistry of silver pastes, [8,9] by increasing the poly-Si layer thickness, [6,7] or by deepening the in-diffusion of phosphorus dopants from the poly-Si layer into wafers. [7,10,11] In this work, we evaluate the possibility to reduce this deterioration of the passivation quality by adjusting the SiN x capping layer thickness and the peak firing temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%