2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-011-0474-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress on characterization of self-incompatibility in Brassica napus L.

Abstract: Self-incompatibility (SI) is a widespread mechanism in flowering plants that promotes outbreeding and thereby increases genetic diversity. Recognition specificity in Brassica is achieved by the interaction of the female determinant S-receptor kinase (SRK) and its ligand, the male determinant S-locus protein 11 (SP11). The interaction between SP11 and SRK triggers the signaling cascade in an S-haplotype-specific manner and results in the rejection of self-pollen, but the signal components involved are still not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will allow the approach of commercial yellow mustard breeding programs to be switched from improving outcrossing populations to developing more uniform elite inbred line varieties. In addition, the availability of dominant and recessive SC gene sources in B. napus would allow the self-incompatibility reproduction system to be used to produce three-way hybrids (Fu 1981 ; Zhang et al 2011 ). In such a system, the recessive SC gene source is used as maintainer (B) for the SI line while the dominant SC gene is used as restorer (R) line to produce SC F 1 hybrids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will allow the approach of commercial yellow mustard breeding programs to be switched from improving outcrossing populations to developing more uniform elite inbred line varieties. In addition, the availability of dominant and recessive SC gene sources in B. napus would allow the self-incompatibility reproduction system to be used to produce three-way hybrids (Fu 1981 ; Zhang et al 2011 ). In such a system, the recessive SC gene source is used as maintainer (B) for the SI line while the dominant SC gene is used as restorer (R) line to produce SC F 1 hybrids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SI of 'S-1300' is recessive to BnS-1/BnS-6 lines but dominant to BnS-7/BnS-6 lines [23,24,29]. A perfect tribe-cross hybrid seed produce system was established by combining 'S-1300' with BnS-1/BnS-6 lines (SI restorer lines) and BnS-7/BnS-6 lines (SI maintainer lines) [24,30]. However, the selfincompatible accessions in floral morphologies are similar to the self-compatible accessions, meaning that it is difficult to discriminate the contaminated plants in SI breeding lines [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition specificity is achieved by interaction of the female determinant SRK with its ligand, the male determinant SP11 (Chapman and Goring, 2010). The interaction between SP11 and SRK triggers the signaling cascade in an S- haplotype-specific manner and results in the rejection of self-pollen, but the signal components involved are still not well characterized (Zhang et al , 2011). S-locus glycoprotein (SLG) encoded by the SLG gene is the second female determinant involved in SI reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, B. napus lines are considered to be homozygous at two S loci, with one S haplotype being derived from B. rapa and the other from B. oleracea . Brassica napus is considered to be self-incompatible like its two ancestors and artificially produced lines, although most cultivated lines are self-compatible (Zhang et al , 2011). Most B. napus contain a class I S haplotype (similar to S 47 of B. rapa )intheAgenome and a class II haplotype (similar to S 15 of B. oleracea ) in the C genome (Okamoto et al , 2007; Zhang et al , 2008a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation