2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress towards more uniform assessment and reporting of soil disturbance for operations, research, and sustainability protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil disturbance due to forest logging may have negative consequence for forest productivity (Binkley, 1991;Curran et al, 2005). Murphy et al (2004) reported decreasing height growth of Pinus radiata D.Don.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil disturbance due to forest logging may have negative consequence for forest productivity (Binkley, 1991;Curran et al, 2005). Murphy et al (2004) reported decreasing height growth of Pinus radiata D.Don.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical review of methods for assessing or monitoring soil disturbance and consultation with statisticians are needed before a reliable system is implemented. Because the amount and severity of soil disturbance is often used as a proxy for longer-term growth impacts and hydrologic functions, it is essential that soil disturbance types are calibrated as to their impacts on tree growth and hydrologic functions based on research studies (Curran et al 2005b).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our role as scientists is to provide technical direction that enables effective communication and comparison of operational and research results. In recent papers, we have described progress towards a common approach in the Pacific Northwest (Curran et al 2005b), and an adaptive management approach for soil conservation (Curran et al 2005a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ministry of Forests (BCMoF) scientists are responsible for both research and operational support, ensuring this integration. To have an effective adaptive management process for soil conservation, each jurisdiction needs to address three objectives: (1) more uniform terms for describing soil disturbance; (2) cost-effective techniques for monitoring and assessing soil disturbance; and (3) reliable, site-specific methods to rate soils for risk of detrimental soil disturbance (Curran et al 2005c). These are briefly discussed below:…”
Section: Adaptive Management For Soil Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents an adaptive management framework for soil disturbance that supports internal operations and policy as well as external reporting for due diligence in forest soil management. To support this framework, common language and key components should be defined and agreed upon (Curran et al 2005c). These components include clear definitions of the various types of monitoring, which are critical to the adaptive management process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%