2018
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progression of Mild to Moderate Stenosis in the Internal Carotid Arteries of Patients With Ischemic Stroke

Abstract: Background and purpose: Severe stenosis in the internal carotid artery may increase the risk of ischemic stroke. The factors that affect the progression of carotid artery stenosis in patients with ischemic stroke are poorly studied. No guidelines for the duration of follow-up of patients with ischemic stroke through carotid ultrasonography exist.Methods: In this retrospective study, 179 patients (108 men; mean age, 68 years) with ischemic stroke and mild to moderate stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Epidemiological studies found that LDL-C was significantly related to the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction, and several studies confirmed that serum LDL-C level was one of the independent risk factors for ischemic stroke [9]. Moreover, previous studies showed that LDL-C level was positively correlated with carotid stenosis in elderly patients with cerebral infarction, and also positively correlated with the severity of cerebral infarction [12]. This discrepancy could also be explained by differences in study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological studies found that LDL-C was significantly related to the pathogenesis of cerebral infarction, and several studies confirmed that serum LDL-C level was one of the independent risk factors for ischemic stroke [9]. Moreover, previous studies showed that LDL-C level was positively correlated with carotid stenosis in elderly patients with cerebral infarction, and also positively correlated with the severity of cerebral infarction [12]. This discrepancy could also be explained by differences in study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las características del estudio se muestran en la tabla 3. Al comparar los datos, la edad media de 78 años fue similar a la previa de 81 años (19), pero ambas son mayores a las descritas en otros trabajos de 66 a 72 años (11,15,20,21,22). Existen asociaciones bien estudiadas con mayor significancia para estenosis carotídea, como son la edad, sobre todo en mayores de 70 años (OR = 4,68); género masculino (OR = 2,16); aumento de las LDL (OR = 1,84); HTA (OR = 3,16), y tabaquismo (OR = 6,18) (18, 22,23,24,25).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…También se han asociado la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y la enfermedad coronaria como condicionante de enfermedad carotídea severa (14, 19,22). En estas dos mediciones, en diferentes periodos (1996-2002 vs. 2014-2018), los factores de riesgo se encuentran presentes y en proporciones muy similares; sin embargo, hay mayor proporción de HTA y de dislipidemia para los datos actuales, con menor proporción de enfermedad coronaria, diabetes y tabaquismo respecto a otras poblaciones como la del estudio Nascet (9,26,27).…”
Section: Tabla 3 Datos Comparativos Con El Estudio Previo (1996-2002) En La Fundación Santa Fe De Bogotáunclassified
“…Exclusion criteria included (1) subjects with mental disorders or disturbances of consciousness and those who could not understand the statements of the research team, (2) patients with acute coronary syndrome, (3) patients with a history of abnormal blood coagulation, and (4) patients who were unwilling to participate in this study. Coronary artery stenosis was calculated using the following equation: (1 − (the diameter of diseased vessel/the diameter of reference)) × 100% according to the result of quantitative coronary angiography [ 29 ]. Depending on the severity of coronary artery stenosis, CAD sufferers were divided into three groups: <30%; 30%~70%; and >70%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%