Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics 2015
DOI: 10.5220/0005561003620368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Co-adaptation in Human-Machine Interaction

Abstract: Abstract:In this paper we discuss the concept of co-adaptation between a human operator and a machine interface and we summarize its application with emphasis on two different domains, teleoperation and assistive technology. The analysis of the literature reveals that only in a few cases the possibility of a temporal evolution of the co-adaptation parameters has been considered. In particular, it has been overlooked the role of time-related indexes that capture changes in motor and cognitive abilities of the h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To adapt arbitration to the user and hence find the optimal amount of assistance, Oh et al [2019] propose to learn the best arbitration parameter online from the user interaction with the system. Considering in general human-machine interfaces, Gallina et al [2015] proposed an approach in between goal-oriented design (which maximizes performance) and human-centered design (which maximizes usability): progressive co-adaptation. The idea here is that as the user through interaction with the system adapts and improves their skills , concurrently the system should monitor these improvements and adjust its parameters accordingly.…”
Section: Adaptation Co-adaptation and Trusting The Assistance Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To adapt arbitration to the user and hence find the optimal amount of assistance, Oh et al [2019] propose to learn the best arbitration parameter online from the user interaction with the system. Considering in general human-machine interfaces, Gallina et al [2015] proposed an approach in between goal-oriented design (which maximizes performance) and human-centered design (which maximizes usability): progressive co-adaptation. The idea here is that as the user through interaction with the system adapts and improves their skills , concurrently the system should monitor these improvements and adjust its parameters accordingly.…”
Section: Adaptation Co-adaptation and Trusting The Assistance Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent work, it was hypothesized that better collaborative approaches can be designed by also considering how humans change their policy by interacting with the robot [16]. Nikolaidis et al [33] introduced a formalization for mutual adaptation between a robot and a human in a collaborative task.…”
Section: Adaptation Of Roles In Phrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human-machine adaptation is a widely studied field even beyond pHRI [16], implementing adaptive control schemes which conform to an unknown gain of the human [17]. Adaptation could be integrated by changing the cobot policy when thresholds of safety have been reached.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A richer dataset with data from naive participants would indeed provide a better characterization not only of the users' sensorimotor behavior in itself, but it would indeed allow testing for learning effects within each participant and individual differences between participants. This would also help to investigate the co-adaptation process between human and robotic systems (Gallina et al, 2015). On the one hand, indeed, visuomotor adaptation to the new environment produces effective motor learning enabling the user to better handle the initially unfamiliar sensorimotor mapping.…”
Section: Configuration (Fixation Time)mentioning
confidence: 99%