2016
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Integration of Design Process into Civil Engineering Curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This progressively integration of design experiences have helped students perform at higher levels of cognitive learning. Assessment data indicates that students are making progressive improvements in problem-solving abilities and are better prepared to complete senior capstone design projects [28].…”
Section: A Technical Pillarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This progressively integration of design experiences have helped students perform at higher levels of cognitive learning. Assessment data indicates that students are making progressive improvements in problem-solving abilities and are better prepared to complete senior capstone design projects [28].…”
Section: A Technical Pillarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these teaching strategies adopted in single courses, progressive integration in the CE curriculum can lead to students' continuous improvement in their problem-solving abilities towards project-based tasks (Jackson and Tarhini, 2016). According to Jackson and Tarhini (2016), the pedagogical approach (i.e., problem-solving framework) could be expanded from freshmen year to upper-level CE courses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Jackson and Tarhini (2016), the pedagogical approach (i.e., problem-solving framework) could be expanded from freshmen year to upper-level CE courses. Therefore, an individual course could be properly embedded into the existing CE curriculum by applying students' knowledge and skills obtained from prerequisites and by offering the framework or platform (e.g., project-based design) for students' follow-up studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Engineering ethics [24]  Leadership skills [3]  Integrating technology (for course admin administration and student usage) [30]  Service-learning and community-based projects [15]  Multidisciplinary projects [19]  Design teams assembled from different majors or emphasis areas within a major [34]  Principles of sustainability [6]  Developing projects that are more user centered in focus [14]  Treating the process as a simulated industry request for proposals (RFP) [5]  Emphasizing hands-on, open-ended problem solving [17] It became apparent in the initial research for this study that there are significant differences between each of the 22 ABET accredited Architectural Engineering programs in the United States, and that these differences would undoubtedly extend into the structure and format of the capstone.…”
Section: A Need For Capstone Coursesmentioning
confidence: 99%