V entricular remodeling, the geometric adaptation to injury after acute myocardial infarction, affects the function of both non-infarcted and infarcted muscle, as well as prognosis. Ventricular dilatation bodes especially poorly for late survival. 1 It has long been recognized that early infarct expansion is the result of lengthening of the noncontractile region undergoing a stress response with secondary volume overload hypertrophy, a process which maybe progressive over time. [2][3][4] The extent of the initial myocardial damage is linked both to the magnitude and, to a lesser degree, the timing of left ventricular (LV) dilatation and ultimately survival. 5 Moreover, ventricular remodeling (enlargement) is influenced not only by infarct size but also the type of infarct healing and coexistent LV wall stresses. 5
See p 2351The most effective interventions to limit or prevent ventricular dilatation after infarction are those addressing the initial myocardial insult through the earliest and most sustained reperfusion therapies. 6 The re-establishment of coronary blood flow to the infarcted region, even if delayed in some circumstances, is thought to attenuate ventricular remodeling. Modification of those biochemical and physiological factors that deform the compromised ventricle also influences late ventricular adaptive responses and prognosis. It is now common knowledge that instituting afterload reduction improves ventricular remodeling, attenuates infarct expansion, and provides long-term clinical improvement. 1 However, of the three major factors involved in the acute infarct remodeling sequence, cardiologists can exert the most influence only at the onset through the timeliness and completeness of reperfusion with successful thrombolysis and/or angioplasty with stenting. Because of the many uncontrollable variables of myocyte salvage, considerable controversies remain regarding the links between the effectiveness of an opened artery after infarction on long-term ventricular function and consequent survival statistics. 7Further insight into the sequence and significance of LV responses is provided by Bolognese et al. 8 In their examination of 284 consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction, Bolognese et al 8 obtained serial echocardiographic and angiographic studies at 24 hours, 1 month, and 6 months. Late followup (61Ϯ14 months) was available in all but 4 patients. Despite excellent infarct-related artery patency rates at 6 months, 30% of patients showed LV dilatation with Ͼ20% increase in end-diastole volume at 6 months compared with 24 hours. Cardiac cath and combined adverse cardiac event rates were significantly higher in patients with as compared with those without LV dilatation. End-systolic volume at 6 months and age were strong predictors of late cardiac death. Three patterns of dilatation, early, late, and progressive, were identified. Early dilatation occurred between 24 hours and 1 month, late dilatation occurred from 1 month to ...