Progressive Resistance Training for Concomitant Increases in Muscle Strength and Bone Mineral Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background Older adults experience considerable muscle and bone loss that are closely interconnected. The efficacy of progressive resistance training programs to concurrently reverse/slow the age-related decline in muscle strength and bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults remains unclear. Objectives We aimed to quantify concomitant changes in lower-body muscle strength and BMD in older adults following a progressive resistance training program and to determine how these changes are influenced by mode (resistance only vs. combined resistance and weight-bearing exercises), frequency, volume, load, and program length. Methods MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase databases were searched for articles published in English before 1 June, 2021. Randomized controlled trials reporting changes in leg press or knee extension one repetition maximum and femur/hip or lumbar spine BMD following progressive resistance training in men and/or women ≥ 65 years of age were included. A random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression determined the effects of resistance training and the individual training characteristics on the percent change (∆%) in muscle strength (standardized mean difference) and BMD (mean difference). The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 2.0) and Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results Seven hundred and eighty studies were identified and 14 were included. Progressive resistance training increased muscle strength (∆ standardized mean difference = 1.1%; 95% confidence interval 0.73, 1.47; p ≤ 0.001) and femur/hip BMD (∆ mean difference = 2.77%; 95% confidence interval 0.44, 5.10; p = 0.02), but not BMD of the lumbar spine (∆ mean difference = 1.60%; 95% confidence interval − 1.44, 4.63; p = 0.30). The certainty for improvement was greater for muscle strength compared with BMD, evidenced by less heterogeneity (I 2 = 78.1% vs 98.6%) and a higher overall quality of evidence. No training characteristic significantly affected both outcomes (p > 0.05), although concomitant increases in strength and BMD were favored by higher training frequencies, increases in strength were favored by resistance only and higher volumes, and increases in BMD were favored by combined resistance plus weight-bearing exercises, lower volumes, and higher loads. Conclusions Progressive resistance training programs concomitantly increase lower-limb muscle strength and femur/hip bone mineral density in older adults, with greater certainty for strength improvement. Thus, to maximize the efficacy of progressive resistance training programs to concurrently prevent muscle and bone loss in older adults, it is recommended to incorporate training characteristics more likely to improve BMD.

‘A Lot of People Just Go for Walks, and Don’t Do Anything Else’: Older Adults in the UK Are Not Aware of the Strength Component Embedded in the Chief Medical Officers’ Physical Activity Guidelines—A Qualitative Study

“…Again, we know that exercise programs that are perceived as being ‘too easy’ act as a deterrent to strength training adherence [ 51 , 57 , 59 ]. Moreover, other benefits of resistance training (for example, increasing bone mineral density and functional capacity), likely require even higher intensities than the intensities that are known to build muscular strength [ 60 , 61 , 62 ]. Taken together, this evidence supports incorporating ‘moderate or higher’ intensity of effort guidance into resistance training programs, as this has been shown to lead to more efficient results, greater satisfaction, and better long-term adherence in our older adult population [ 35 , 51 , 55 , 63 ].…”

Rehabilitation of Older Adults with Sarcopenia: From Cell to Functioning

“…Finally, because a reduction in muscle mass occurs frequently together with a decline in bone mineral density, it is relevant to note the results of a recent meta-analysis showing the beneficial effects of resistance training on both skeletal muscle and the skeleton. 72) An interesting variant of PRE training is called power-or velocity-specific training. One key element of this type of training is the inclusion of fast concentric muscle actions combined with slow eccentric components.…”

Intensity-dependent cardiopulmonary response during and after strength training

“…Although strength training has grown increasingly popular in recent decades and regular strength training’s long-term effects have been widely documented 23 – 27 , the acute cardiopulmonary response moreover is often only investigated by relying on standard parameters like heart rate and oxygen uptake. Hemodynamic parameters have been primarily analyzed in conjunction with endurance training 28 , 29 and seldom in strength training, whereby the few studies differ regarding the comparison groups in intensity, number of repetitions 17 , 18 , or used muscle mass 19 .…”