2022
DOI: 10.1109/jstsp.2022.3142514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Achoo: A Practical Model and Application for COVID-19 Detection From Recordings of Breath, Voice, and Cough

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic created significant interest and demand for infection detection and monitoring solutions. In this paper, we propose a machine learning method to quickly detect COVID-19 using audio recordings made on consumer devices. The approach combines signal processing and noise removal methods with an ensemble of fine-tuned deep learning networks and enables COVID detection on coughs. We have also developed and deployed a mobile application that uses a symptoms checker together with voice, breath, a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ponomarchuk et al [33] proposed a machine learning method to detect COVID-19 based on breath, voice rapidly, and cough of open, private datasets with verified labels from hospitals and app data. They proposed a hybrid ensemble model that combines vggish and cochleagram, Mel spectrogram, and gradient boosting with patient information as feature values, lightweight CNN, and logistic regression.…”
Section: Lightweight Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ponomarchuk et al [33] proposed a machine learning method to detect COVID-19 based on breath, voice rapidly, and cough of open, private datasets with verified labels from hospitals and app data. They proposed a hybrid ensemble model that combines vggish and cochleagram, Mel spectrogram, and gradient boosting with patient information as feature values, lightweight CNN, and logistic regression.…”
Section: Lightweight Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A head-to-head comparison of the results presented in Table 1 would be hasty and unwise as the evaluation metrics were not reported consistently. For instance, Chaudhari et al [ 17 ], Coppock et al [ 29 ], Ponomarchuk et al [ 38 ] and Nguyen et al [ 39 ] used only the AUC metric, while Lella and Pja [ 40 ] used accuracy only. Different evaluation metrics are used as follows: where FP refers to false positive, FN refers to false negative, TP refers to true positive, and TN refers to true negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a publicly available dataset of COVID and non-COVID cough recordings 20 . The data contain 1322 cough recordings from as many subjects, collected by the MedInGroup primary health network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%