2009
DOI: 10.1108/01443570910938998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project manager‐project (PM‐P) fit and project success

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the importance of a fit between project managers' (PMs) personalities and the “personalities” of their projects, for project success; taking a psychological rather than a project management perspective.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 289 Israeli PMs responded to a specially designed questionnaire that classified projects along three dimensions: Novelty, Complexity and Technological Uncertainty, analyses PM's personality traits that were identified as rele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These skills tend to be often described as "soft skills" or "other" attributes from an HRM perspective. However, research suggests that personal aspects are important in the project manager role (Bierhoff & Müller, 2005;Clarke, 2010a;Gehring, 2007;Malach-Pines, Dvir, & Sadeh, 2009;Thal & Bedingfield, 2010). Hao and Swierczek (2010) measured managers' competencies as the ability to delegate authority, to negotiate, to coordinate, to make decisions, and to understand their roles and responsibilities.…”
Section: Personal Competencementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These skills tend to be often described as "soft skills" or "other" attributes from an HRM perspective. However, research suggests that personal aspects are important in the project manager role (Bierhoff & Müller, 2005;Clarke, 2010a;Gehring, 2007;Malach-Pines, Dvir, & Sadeh, 2009;Thal & Bedingfield, 2010). Hao and Swierczek (2010) measured managers' competencies as the ability to delegate authority, to negotiate, to coordinate, to make decisions, and to understand their roles and responsibilities.…”
Section: Personal Competencementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The development and improvement of these skills were seen as important parts of enhancing professional development and adaptability (Hansson, Backlund, & Lycke, 2003). Personality characteristics have been examined in the literature (Dolfi & Andrews, 2007;Dvir, Sadeh, & Malach-Pines, 2006;Gehring, 2007;Malach-Pines et al, 2009;Thal & Bedingfield, 2010). Dvir et al (2006) tested the hypothesis that a project with a particular profile needed a manager with fitting personality traits in order to achieve optimal performance and success.…”
Section: Personal Competencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Successful projects also contributes to company's success in long term in terms of gaining a competitive advantages; enhancing company's reputation; increasing the market share; and reaching specified revenue and profits (Al-Tmeemy, 2011). Project manager whose personality profile was close to the ideal Project Manager's profile for a particular project type were more successful in impact on the customers, benefit to the organization and overall success (Malach et' al, 2009). This ultimately means that the project managers who understand the projects will be in a better position to satisfy the clients of the project and the stakeholders.…”
Section: Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, while the underlying rationale for all projects is that they seek specific target benefits (Dvir and Lechler, 2004), benefits do not appear among the criteria used in most performance measurement systems. Even in studies which consider benefits, there is a general assumption that project managers should be held accountable for their realization (Malach-Pines, Dvir and Sadeh, 2009;Office of Government Commerce, 2007). By way of contrast, principal-agent theory (Bozec, Dia and Bozec, 2010;Eisenhardt, 1989;Segrestin and Hatchuel, 2011) suggests that accountabilities for outputs and outcomes should be split among different stakeholders.…”
Section: (Economic Resources)mentioning
confidence: 99%