2007
DOI: 10.1177/875697280703800205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Project Scheduling: Improved Approach to Incorporate Uncertainty Using Bayesian Networks

Abstract: Project scheduling inevitably involves uncertainty. The basic inputs (i.e., time, cost, and resources for each activity) are not deterministic and are affected by various sources of uncertainty. Moreover, there is a causal relationship between these uncertainty sources and project parameters; this causality is not modeled in current state-of-the-art project planning techniques (such as simulation techniques). This paper introduces an approach, using Bayesian network modeling, that addresses both uncertainty an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…So we approximate g 5 by g 5c (x 1 , x 3 ) as defined in Equation 5. After marginalization of X 1 , we get g 6c (x 3 ), which is a 6-piece, 3-degree MOP approximation of the PDF of X 3 defined on the domain (3,27). It takes approximately 1.31 s to compute g 6c (·).…”
Section: Using Hypercube Mopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So we approximate g 5 by g 5c (x 1 , x 3 ) as defined in Equation 5. After marginalization of X 1 , we get g 6c (x 3 ), which is a 6-piece, 3-degree MOP approximation of the PDF of X 3 defined on the domain (3,27). It takes approximately 1.31 s to compute g 6c (·).…”
Section: Using Hypercube Mopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact marginal distribution of X 3 is N (15,13). A plot of g 6c overlaid on the plot of the PDF of N(15, 13) truncated to (3,27) is shown in Figure 4 (left).…”
Section: Using Hypercube Mopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge is to reduce project duration while evaluating the degree of uncertainty. Schedule compression involves uncertainties, which may arise from variability and ambiguity (Khodakarami et al 2007). Schedule compression either increases risks or requires additional resources, so risk must be taken into account (Shankar et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, there already exist well-established tools for making decisions optimally once uncertainty has been recognized (Ding and Zhu, 2015;Elmaghraby, 2003; Morgan and Henrion, 1992; Chapman and Ward, 1997;Clemen, 1996;Khodakarami, Fenton and Neil, 2007;Pich, Loch and DeMeyer, 2002). Many of these approaches, e.g., decision trees, influence diagrams, are already recognized in both the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBOK, BKCASE 2019) and the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK, Project Management Institute, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%