1998
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projected Multivariate Linear Models for Directional Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for each person tested there are three replicates at each of 24 equispaced angles around the circle, necessitating either a hierarchical random‐effects specification or a marginal approach to account for correlation within a subject. Presnell et al. (1998) considered a projection approach to model circular outcomes easily via a linear model; this model could conceivably be extended to the mixed model case but is not suitable for the bimodal data that are considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for each person tested there are three replicates at each of 24 equispaced angles around the circle, necessitating either a hierarchical random‐effects specification or a marginal approach to account for correlation within a subject. Presnell et al. (1998) considered a projection approach to model circular outcomes easily via a linear model; this model could conceivably be extended to the mixed model case but is not suitable for the bimodal data that are considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from the use of the asymptotic covariance matrix italicξfalse^1italicζfalse^italicξfalse^1 in place of the information matrix, formulas for fitted values and their standard errors in the MSPMLM are the same as those given by Presnell et al . () for ML estimation in the SPMLM.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the work of Gould () and Johnson & Wehrly (), Fisher & Lee () proposed models in which one or both of the mean direction and concentration parameters are related to covariates through a linear predictor and link function which maps the real line (the range of the linear predictor) to the appropriate range of the corresponding von Mises parameter ( i.e ., to (− π , π ) in the case of the mean direction and [0,∞) for the concentration). As pointed out by Presnell, Morrison & Littell (), however, there are serious drawbacks to this approach, including multimodality of the likelihood surface, non‐identifiability, and computational problems. Instead, these authors proposed a class of models based upon the angular normal distribution, which has a latent variable formulation, in which the observed angular response corresponds to the angle formed by an underlying latent multivariate normal random vector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative approach is to use the offset normal distribution, allowing the mean vector (µ 1 , µ 2 ) of the bivariate normal to be a linear function of the covariates. See Ref 55 for parameter estimation using maximum likelihood. This method seems to have better numerical properties than the method using monotone link functions.…”
Section: Regression and Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%