2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1539089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projection of Supply and Use Tables: Methods and their Empirical Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Temurshoev et al, 2011)). The WAPE indicator is defined as a weighted average of the variation rates of the (i,j)-th element with respect to the same (i,j)-th element of the other matrix, which is usually considered as the true/official value 1 .…”
Section: Methods For Comparing the Main Components Of The Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Temurshoev et al, 2011)). The WAPE indicator is defined as a weighted average of the variation rates of the (i,j)-th element with respect to the same (i,j)-th element of the other matrix, which is usually considered as the true/official value 1 .…”
Section: Methods For Comparing the Main Components Of The Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that the Euro method also requires that the Use table at basic prices is distinguished between domestic and imported intermediate and final uses. We do not explain the Euro and EUKLEMS methods in this paper due to space constraints, and refer the reader to Temurshoev et al (2010) who present detailed description of both methods for updating SUTs.…”
Section: Empirical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Temurshoev et al (2010) eight different methods were studied and evaluated in the estimation of the Dutch and Spanish Use and Supply tables and it was concluded that the well-known (G)RAS algorithm was generally superior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data balancing occurs in IO analysis under different circumstances, of which the most thoroughly explored is the problem of table update when row and column sums,m R i andm C j , are known for the current year, and interior points, µ * ij , are known from a previous year [13]. In this problem, the goal is to update each interior point to m * ij , such that M * e =m R and M * e =m C .…”
Section: Proportional and Cross-entropy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the classical table update problem [5], there is an initial estimate from the previous year for interior points (low quality data) and row and column sums for the present year (high quality data). In practice the data update problem combines data from multiple sources and differing degrees of trustworthiness [11][12][13]. The present paper deals with the general problem of combining data with differing degrees of quality (e.g., data from national statistical offices, from international organizations, survey data, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%