1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02435880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Projective fourier duality and Weyl quantization

Abstract: The Weyl-Wigner correspondence prescription, which makes great use of Fourier duality, is reexamined from the point of view of Kac algebras, the most general background for noncommutative Fourier analysis allowing for that property. It is shown how the standard Kac structure has to be extended in order to accommodate the physical requirements. Both an Abelian and a symmetric projective Kac algebra are shown to provide, in close parallel to the standard case, a new dual framework and a well-defined notion of pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of this factor 2 was already mentioned in Howe [6,7]. For quite another approach using Kac algebras, see Aldrovandi and Saeger [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The significance of this factor 2 was already mentioned in Howe [6,7]. For quite another approach using Kac algebras, see Aldrovandi and Saeger [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Then 5c consists of all complex numbers of the form y\ • • • Yi w ' t n Yi a n " i t n r o o t °f unity. This is clearly a subgroup of S1 .D Any finite subgroup of S 1 is cyclic. Let |5c| = m, so that S G consists of all mth roots of unity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the Stone-von Neumann theorem [25], the former is equal to (Z − {0}) ∪ R 2 , while the latter is just Z − {0}. We have shown in a separate paper [2] that the Weyl-Wigner formalism can be described in terms of duality of projective Kac algebras. In such a projective duality framework for R 2 , Weyl's formula comes from an expression analogous to (69) for the decomposition of the respective Fourier representation, namely…”
Section: Coadjoint Orbits Of G Hpmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…By the Stone-yon Neumann theorem (Taylor, 1986), the former is equal to (Z -{0}) U R 2, while the latter is just Z -{0}. We have shown (Aldrovandi and Saeger, 1996) where q,/~ are the usual position and momentum operators. Comparing (81) with Weyl's formula, we get immediately v = h -l. Actually, the only formal difference between (68) and the original Weyl formula,or (81), is that the latter is written in terms of unitary irreducible projective operators instead of the linear ones which appear in formula (68).…”
Section: Quantization On the Half-planementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation