Practical Alternatives to Laboratory in a Basic Chemistry Course Any instructor who has ever supervised a laboratory for rion-chemistry majors and has carefully observed students at work must have often come to conclusions like these: "This is, indeed, an eye-opening experiment for our students. They are learning a lot of things here which they should remember for a long time to come. This should be of tremendous help in their study of chemistry." We had been guided by similar subjective impressions from the past when introducing, in 1971, our Basic Chemistry course and decided,, therefore, to add a laboratory to the 3 hours of lecture per week. While the expectations remained high for a long time, the rising costs of materials and services prompted us soon to question the merits of a laboratory. This paper describes an attempt to evaluate moTe objectively the contribution of laboratory experience on the student achievement in an elementary, oneterm chemistry course and suggests some less expensive alternatives.