1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(15)33513-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prolapse of the umbilical cord, including a late follow-up of fetal survivors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1962
1962
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If it is performed before the head is engaged, the risk of prolapse is high (2,4,5). If it is performed before the head is engaged, the risk of prolapse is high (2,4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is performed before the head is engaged, the risk of prolapse is high (2,4,5). If it is performed before the head is engaged, the risk of prolapse is high (2,4,5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was concluded that cord complications played a major role in perinatal mortality and morbidity but the occurence of cord complications never exceeded 20 per cent of the total number of risk factors. Although the present material did not include prolapsed cords this Situation is only present in about 0.4% of all deliveries [4] compared to other cord complications being present in about 30% of all deliveries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In one of these papers [2] no control group without cord complications was used; in the other paper only cases with innocuous cardiotocographic patterns (CTG) were included in the control group [12]. Although cord prolapse is a very dangerous Situation if delivery is not terminated at once [1], this Situation only occurs in 0.43 per cent of all deliveries [4] and the effect of all other types of cord complications per se still remains to be investigated. As 152 patients in our department were monitored with continuous scalp tissue pH (tpH) during labour followed by determination of the oxygenation and acid base state of both umbilical artery and vein, and äs the position of the umbilical cord was noted in 142 of these patients, we have had the opportunity of investigating the effect of cord complications per se on all the above mentioned values and on the APGAR score.…”
Section: T Webermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sie ziehen in Erwägung, dass eine vorangegangene Schädigung des Kindes die primäre Ursache für einen NSV sein könnte. Cushner [8], Uygur et al [35] sowie eigene Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Nabelschnur auch vorfallen kann, wenn der vorangehende Kindesteil vorher einen Bezug zum Becken hatte. Auch kann sich ein bereits fixierter vorangehender Kindesteil wieder lockern ( [17], persönliche Mitteilung und eigene Erfahrung).…”
Section: Befragung Von öSterreichischen Fachleutenunclassified