2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2012.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on silicon-doped TiO2 film deposited by cathodic arc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, although there was no marked difference between the cell proliferation on Si–TiO 2 -NT and TiO 2 -NT substrates, the osteogenic activity of cells was markedly improved when they were cultured on Si–TiO 2 -NT compared to both TiO 2 -NT and Ti substrates. The fact that Si doping affected the differentiation of cells, but not their proliferation, on TiO 2 -NT treated surfaces slightly differs from our previous finding, in which Si-doped TiO 2 films appeared to favor both osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation [ 32 ]. This might be the result of the topographical difference (rough TiO 2 nanotubes versus relatively smooth TiO 2 film surface).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, although there was no marked difference between the cell proliferation on Si–TiO 2 -NT and TiO 2 -NT substrates, the osteogenic activity of cells was markedly improved when they were cultured on Si–TiO 2 -NT compared to both TiO 2 -NT and Ti substrates. The fact that Si doping affected the differentiation of cells, but not their proliferation, on TiO 2 -NT treated surfaces slightly differs from our previous finding, in which Si-doped TiO 2 films appeared to favor both osteoblastic proliferation and differentiation [ 32 ]. This might be the result of the topographical difference (rough TiO 2 nanotubes versus relatively smooth TiO 2 film surface).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…As expected, MC3T3-E1 cells showed more spread morphology and extended more filopodia when cultured on both Si–TiO 2 -NT and TiO 2 -NT substrates compared to those on Ti surfaces ( Figure 3 and Figure 4 ). This is in accordance with a number of previous studies in which both surface micro-/nano-topography and Si doping were found to markedly affect cellular behaviors [ 32 , 39 , 40 ]. All substrates did not show any cytotoxicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some nonadherent cells were not removed and exhibited small and round shape. Previous research also showed that cellular activity and growth were influenced by the surface characteristics such as topography . Another phenomenon was found that cells on the margin of collagen hydrogel were very crowded, seen as Figure (D2), which demonstrated that the collagen hydrogel contracted from circumference to the center.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TiO 2 nanotubes with varying dimensions have been shown to regulate MSC differentiation . Silicon‐doped TiO 2 coatings (Si‐TiO 2 ) formed by either micro or cathodic arc oxidation, have also recently been shown to improve the response of osteogenic cells, although it is important to point out that the Si‐TiO 2 films were porous and therefore not capable of fully blocking out the underlying bulk properties of the CoCrMo. Nevertheless, the enhanced osteogenic response from Si‐TiO 2 presents a possible next‐step for potentially increasing the biocompatibility of CoCrMo further, via the inclusion of Si into the TiO 2 CVD coatings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%