2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00053-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferation of cancer cells despite CDK2 inhibition

Abstract: We have investigated the contribution of CDK4 and CDK2 inhibition to G1 arrest in colon cancers following inhibition of the MEK/MAP kinase pathway. CDK4 inhibition is sufficient to cause arrest, but inhibition of CDK2 by p27 Kip1 redistribution or ectopic expression has no effect on proliferation. Likewise, inhibition of CDK2 through expression of dominant-negative (DN) CDK2 or antisense oligonucleotides did not prevent cell proliferation in these cells. We therefore tested whether CDK2 activity is dispensable… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
399
5
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 459 publications
(421 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
16
399
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These steps are frequently deregulated in malignant cells and are therefore potential targets for cancer intervening drugs (Vermeulen et al, 2003). However, recent findings suggested a high functional redundancy of the G1-S regulatory components, like CDK4 and CDK2 (Berthet et al, 2003;Ortega et al, 2003;Tetsu and McCormick, 2003;Malumbres et al, 2004;Sherr and Roberts, 2004). This new insight raises the need for identification of new regulators of the G1-S transition phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steps are frequently deregulated in malignant cells and are therefore potential targets for cancer intervening drugs (Vermeulen et al, 2003). However, recent findings suggested a high functional redundancy of the G1-S regulatory components, like CDK4 and CDK2 (Berthet et al, 2003;Ortega et al, 2003;Tetsu and McCormick, 2003;Malumbres et al, 2004;Sherr and Roberts, 2004). This new insight raises the need for identification of new regulators of the G1-S transition phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it has been shown that CDK2 activity is dispensable for the growth of different colon carcinoma cell lines, among other tumor cell lines. 38 After that, targeted disruption of CDK2 gene in mice has shown that CDK2 is also dispensable for embryonic development and cell cycle progression, as knocked out mice were fully viable. 39 Reinforcing this idea, CycE1 and CycE2 double knockout mice are also viable and show no major developmental problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 In the presence of elevated E2F, associated with cancer, inhibition of CDK2 can lead to apoptosis. 45 Given recent findings, 1,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]46 there is no reason to think that CDK2 is universally needed to all normal cells. Likely, certain types of normal cells are CDK2 independent.…”
Section: Cdk2: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Certain cancer cells are insensitive to both endogenous and pharmacological inhibitors of CDKs. For therapy of such cancers, CDK2 inhibitors can be used too, yet for a different purpose: namely, for protection of normal cells from chemotherapy.…”
Section: Cdk2: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%