“…Phronesis in teaching has been described as a kind of “practical wisdom” (Dunne, 2011; Phelan, 2001, 2005a, 2005b), “practical reasoning” (Dunne and Pendlebury, 2002; Pendlebury, 1993; Phelan, 2009), and “practical judgment” (Biesta, 2013; Coulter and Wiens, 2002; Dunne, 1997, 1999), and the link between phronesis and teacher education has taken up and explored in different ways: its conceptual meaning (Coulter and Wiens, 2008; Field and Macintyre Latta, 2001; Martin, 2007; Phelan, 2001), its manifest in practice (Jope, 2014; Phelan, 2009), and its implications for program design (Barak and Gidron, 2016; Lund, Panayotidis, Smits, and Towers, 2012; Phelan, 2005b; Towers, 2012). Phronesis is a teacher's ethical and plainly educative capacity “to feel or act towards the right person to the right extent at the right time for the right reasons in the right way” (Aristotle, 2004, 1109a26-29), and an important question for teacher education is: how do teacher candidates begin to acquire this capacity?…”