Why Do We Educate? Renewing the Conversation 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9781444307214.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prologue: Renewing the Conversation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phronesis in teaching has been described as a kind of “practical wisdom” (Dunne, 2011; Phelan, 2001, 2005a, 2005b), “practical reasoning” (Dunne and Pendlebury, 2002; Pendlebury, 1993; Phelan, 2009), and “practical judgment” (Biesta, 2013; Coulter and Wiens, 2002; Dunne, 1997, 1999), and the link between phronesis and teacher education has taken up and explored in different ways: its conceptual meaning (Coulter and Wiens, 2008; Field and Macintyre Latta, 2001; Martin, 2007; Phelan, 2001), its manifest in practice (Jope, 2014; Phelan, 2009), and its implications for program design (Barak and Gidron, 2016; Lund, Panayotidis, Smits, and Towers, 2012; Phelan, 2005b; Towers, 2012). Phronesis is a teacher's ethical and plainly educative capacity “to feel or act towards the right person to the right extent at the right time for the right reasons in the right way” (Aristotle, 2004, 1109a26-29), and an important question for teacher education is: how do teacher candidates begin to acquire this capacity?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phronesis in teaching has been described as a kind of “practical wisdom” (Dunne, 2011; Phelan, 2001, 2005a, 2005b), “practical reasoning” (Dunne and Pendlebury, 2002; Pendlebury, 1993; Phelan, 2009), and “practical judgment” (Biesta, 2013; Coulter and Wiens, 2002; Dunne, 1997, 1999), and the link between phronesis and teacher education has taken up and explored in different ways: its conceptual meaning (Coulter and Wiens, 2008; Field and Macintyre Latta, 2001; Martin, 2007; Phelan, 2001), its manifest in practice (Jope, 2014; Phelan, 2009), and its implications for program design (Barak and Gidron, 2016; Lund, Panayotidis, Smits, and Towers, 2012; Phelan, 2005b; Towers, 2012). Phronesis is a teacher's ethical and plainly educative capacity “to feel or act towards the right person to the right extent at the right time for the right reasons in the right way” (Aristotle, 2004, 1109a26-29), and an important question for teacher education is: how do teacher candidates begin to acquire this capacity?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%