2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4123622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prominin 1 Significantly Correlated with Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer and Influenced the Patient’s Prognosis

Abstract: Background. This study is aimed at identifying the important biomarkers associated with bone metastasis (BM) in breast cancer (BRCA). Methods. The GSE175692 dataset was used to detect significant differential expressed genes (DEGs) between BRCA samples with or without BM, and DEG-related pathways were then explored. Further, we constructed the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network on GEGs and filtered 5 vital nodes. We then performed the Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, nomogram, and ROC curve to fil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we gradually conducted univariate Cox analysis, Kaplan-Meier, nomogram, and ROC analyses on 15 genes using two datasets at the same time to identify the most significant prognosis-related gene. It should be noted that a similar study by Yu et al recently published also revealed the bone metastasis-related DEGs using the same datasets ( 24 ), but the overall arrangement of the two reports was different. The Yu et al study firstly identified the DEGs and evaluated the clinical value of hub genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, we gradually conducted univariate Cox analysis, Kaplan-Meier, nomogram, and ROC analyses on 15 genes using two datasets at the same time to identify the most significant prognosis-related gene. It should be noted that a similar study by Yu et al recently published also revealed the bone metastasis-related DEGs using the same datasets ( 24 ), but the overall arrangement of the two reports was different. The Yu et al study firstly identified the DEGs and evaluated the clinical value of hub genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%