2017
DOI: 10.1080/13507486.2017.1307811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promise and challenge of European Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…eastern europe's desire to integrate into, or at the very least seek closer association with, the institutional infrastructure of the eU was paralleled by its desire to elevate regional experiences of World War II to the level of pan-european memory. 42 However, interpretations of the past that were uncontroversial and widely accepted in post-communist europe, particularly the idea that the violence of World War II primarily affected dominant nationalities such as the Poles, Ukrainians or Belarusians rather than the Jews, challenged the narrative of World War II that had been cultivated in the eU, particularly by France and germany. Moreover, in large part because national identity was poorly developed or its expression stunted in many eastern european states, political leaders as well as societies have tended to search for affirmative episodes and interpretations that depict important historical figures and events in a heroic light, while downplaying or whitewashing those that question this script.…”
Section: European Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…eastern europe's desire to integrate into, or at the very least seek closer association with, the institutional infrastructure of the eU was paralleled by its desire to elevate regional experiences of World War II to the level of pan-european memory. 42 However, interpretations of the past that were uncontroversial and widely accepted in post-communist europe, particularly the idea that the violence of World War II primarily affected dominant nationalities such as the Poles, Ukrainians or Belarusians rather than the Jews, challenged the narrative of World War II that had been cultivated in the eU, particularly by France and germany. Moreover, in large part because national identity was poorly developed or its expression stunted in many eastern european states, political leaders as well as societies have tended to search for affirmative episodes and interpretations that depict important historical figures and events in a heroic light, while downplaying or whitewashing those that question this script.…”
Section: European Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the concept of cosmopolitan memory has become a shared starting point, and oftentimes a normative ideal, for many studies of transnational memory dynamics (e.g., Assmann 2014; Assmann and Conrad 2010). It has also been extended to include ideas about universalizing memory (Pestel et al 2017). But these mnemonic constructs do not translate well to the Russian case.…”
Section: Logics Of Rememberingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the scope of war narratives has broadened. While the question of their compliance with the Holocaust narrative has to be asked with respect to the prevailing european discussion, 36 these post-Soviet national narratives are predominantly being built around the victimized images of the Warsaw Pact nations that were not part of the Soviet Union proper-in the Baltic states and in Ukraine.…”
Section: Theoretical Viewpoints: Memory Immigration Media and Publmentioning
confidence: 99%