Promise and peril-defining ethical telehealth practice from the clinician and patient perspective: A qualitative study

Abstract

Objectives We undertook a qualitative study to examine and compare the experience of ethical principles by telehealth practitioners and patients in relation to service delivery theory. The study was conducted prior to and during the recent global increase in the use of telehealth services due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 telehealth practitioners and patients using constructionist grounded theory methods to collect and analyse data. Twenty-five axial coded data categories were then unified and aligned through selective coding with the Beauchamp and Childress (2013) framework of biomedical ethics. The groups were then compared. Results Thirteen categories aligned to the ethical framework were identified for practitioners and 12 for patients. Variance existed between the groups. Practitioner results were non-maleficence 4/13 or (31%), beneficence 4/13 (31%), professional–patient relationships 3/12 (22%), autonomy 1/13 (8%) and justice 1/13 (8%). Patient data results were non-maleficence 4/12 (33%), professional–patient relationships 3/12 (33%), autonomy 2/12 (18%), beneficence 1/12 (8%) and justice 1/12 (8%). Conclusions Ethical principles are experienced differently between telehealth practitioners and patients. These differences can impact the quality and safety of care. Practitioners feel telehealth provides better care overall than patients do. Patients felt telehealth may force a greater share of costs and burdens onto them and reduce equity. Both patients and practitioners felt telehealth can be more harmful than face-to-face service delivery when it creates new or increased risk of harms. Building sufficient trust and mutual understanding are equally important to patients as privacy and confidentiality.

Experiences of using surveillance cameras as a monitoring solution at nursing homes: The eldercare personnel’s perspectives

“…To prevent ethical problems, the eldercare personnel also need to know how to maintain the hardware and the software [16]. Fulfillment of such requirements suggests that surveillance cameras may be ethical as they deliver care services with a higher autonomy for the older people [36].…”

Telemedicine, Telepsychiatry and COVID-19 Pandemic: Future Prospects for Global Health

“…The relevance of such prescriptions is bound to grow further as telemedicine will come to rely on ever-more sophisticated and advanced technologies such as machine learning artificial intelligence and robotics [ 55 ]. By the same token, it is an ethical imperative to address the digital divide, which prevents access to telemedicine services for millions of people both in developing and wealthy countries.…”

“I was Unsure at First”: A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Perceptions of VA Clinical Video Telehealth Visits in the V-IMPACT Program

“…Gordon et al ( 13 ) argue that video visits provide an opportunity for providers to “facilitate patient engagement and accommodate patient concerns and requests” (p1757), which some patients experienced in our study, and others did not. Providers and administrators should consider special attention to both relationship building and clear communication about virtual care to increase patient buy-in and better patient experience ( 22 ), especially to ensure the longer-term sustainability of telemedicine modalities ( 16 ).…”