Promoción de la resiliencia en niños con sintomatología depresiva

Hernández, O.; Carrillo, Francisco Xavier Méndez; Garber, Judy

doi:10.6018/analesps.32.3.261671

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Though the mean effects were significant they were small: g = 0.11 at outcome and 0.21 at follow-up. A program based on the Penn Resilience Program also found the treatment effective for depression compared to control in a pilot study involving Spanish-speaking youth (Sanchez et al, 2016). Another source of evidence comes from longitudinal research that has demonstrated self-reported resilience predicts the development of mental health problems in high-stress work situations (Wild et al, 2016).…”

Section: Meaningfulnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Skills for life: A review of life skills and their measurability, malleability, and meaningfulness

McGrath¹,

Adler²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely accepted that schools and other settings catering to youth can play an essential role in offering education in life skills and character. However, there exists a broad array of potential targets for such programs, suggesting the need for guidance on which targets are most likely to result in demonstrable and valuable results. This report attempts to integrate a broad literature addressing the universe of targets for skills development programs for youth. After identifying a set of 30 candidate skills to investigate further, research literature was reviewed to evaluate each skill on three dimensions. Measurability had to do with the extent to which adequate measurement tools were available for evaluating skill level, with emphasis on those tools specifically used for younger populations and available in multiple languages, particularly in Spanish. Malleability had to do with the extent to which there is evidence that interventions have the potential to modify skill level, with emphasis on those that have been extensively evaluated through randomized controlled trials. Finally, meaningfulness had to do with the extent to which evidence exists demonstrating that the higher levels of skill can result in consequential outcomes. Based on these criteria, 10 skills were selected for further review as having the most compelling evidence to date that they are life skills that matter: Mindfulness, Empathy and compassion, Self-efficacy/ Self-determination, Problem solving, Critical thinking, Goal orientation and goal completion, Resilience/Stress resistance, Self-awareness, Purposefulness, and Self-regulation/Self-control/Emotion regulation. The evidence for each is summarized. We finish with a review of key issues to consider in the design, implementation, and evaluation of life skills that matter.

show abstract

Section: Meaningfulnessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Skills for life: A review of life skills and their measurability, malleability, and meaningfulness

McGrath¹,

Adler²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pareja (Cienfuegos & Díaz-Loving, 2010) es una escala que ha sido utilizada en varios estudios (Cienfuegos, 2014;Méndez, 2014;Sánchez & Méndez, 2015). El Conflict Tactic Scale -2 (Straus et al, 1996), ha sido una escala ampliamente utilizada desde su publicación, aunque la versión traducida al español (Graña et al, 2013) muestra resultados de confiabilidad menores en todas las escalas, así como la correlación entre las subescalas (Ver tabla 1).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Elaboración Y Validación De Una Escala Para Medir El Maltrato en Parejas (Emp)

Barajas-Vásquez,

Gualaco-Ayala,

Poveda-Atuesta

et al. 2023

ACPP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La violencia íntima de parejas ha sido un fenómeno de reciente interés científico por sus consecuencias entre los miembros que la conforman, en su descendencia y en sus demás relaciones interpersonales. Su prevención y detección temprana son una prioridad académica y profesional. El presente estudio reporta la elaboración y validación de un nuevo instrumento para medir y revelar este fenómeno: la Escala de Maltrato en Parejas – EMP. En dos estudios sucesivos, se logró demostrar su validez y confiabilidad. En la primera versión (Piloto – Estudio 1), dirigida a parejas jóvenes [EMP(J)], era unidireccional en la detección del maltrato. En la segunda versión (Validación – Estudio 2), además de incluir la bidireccional del mismo, se agregó la medición del maltrato con el uso de medios virtuales (Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación – TICs, o Comunicación Mediada por Computadores – CMC). La versión final del EMP resultó tanto válida como confiable, además de identificar dos tipos diferentes de maltrato sexual: (1) por desvaloración y (2) por coacción. Se requiere continuar con procesos de validación concurrente con otros instrumentos que midan el fenómeno de la violencia en pareja, con variables similares en definición y contenido, al igual que con otros que midan procesos opuestos como las escalas que miden satisfacción en las relaciones interpersonales.

show abstract