2011
DOI: 10.4161/epi.6.2.13658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoter context determines the role of proteasome in ligand-dependent occupancy of retinoic acid responsive elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). Apart from activating gene transcription upon ligand induction, the function of RXR in the absence of ligand is also important for establishing chromatin signatures at genomic loci (40,45,46). Thus, our data suggest that RXR knockdown per se would perturb RXR-mediated chromatin modifications at regulatory loci and subsequently affect gene expression, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…4). Apart from activating gene transcription upon ligand induction, the function of RXR in the absence of ligand is also important for establishing chromatin signatures at genomic loci (40,45,46). Thus, our data suggest that RXR knockdown per se would perturb RXR-mediated chromatin modifications at regulatory loci and subsequently affect gene expression, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…At indicated time points, cells were fixed, crosslinked, and sonicated as previously described29. Chromatin DNA was purified using the Omega Bio-tek Cycle Pure Kit (Omega) and quantified using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (ND-1000) to ensure equal amounts of chromatin were used in the immunoprecipitation of different samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChIP experiments exploring the interaction of proteasome subunits with chromatin have produced contradictory results in terms of how 19S versus 20S subunits behave. Some studies have reported identical or overlapping patterns of binding for 19S and 20S proteins [ 21 , 23 , 26 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], others have focused specifically on 19S components [ 25 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], and others still have reported that 19S and 20S proteasome subunits behave differently in terms of chromatin association patterns, with significant disparity in ChIP signals of 19S versus 20S proteins [ 24 , 42 ]. At the activated GAL1 gene, for example, Gillette et al [ 42 ] reported that 19S proteins associate with the GAL1 promoter (5') soon after induction, absent of any 20S proteins, whereas 20S proteins associate later in the induction process and accumulate at the 3' end of the gene.…”
Section: The Form Of the Proteasome That Associates With Chromatinmentioning
confidence: 99%