2017
DOI: 10.1596/28955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Disaster Resilient Cultural Heritage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among other things, this paper established how even in these relatively advanced countries cultural heritage is left out in risk management planning and strategies (Bonazza et al 2018). Stanton-Geddes, Soz, and Bonte-Grapentin's 2017 Promoting Disaster Resilient Cultural Heritage also used the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 in proffering the following pointers for the protection of cultural heritage: the establishment of appropriate laws, policies, and institutional frameworks; the continuous understanding of risks; the reduction of risks and building of capacities; and the preparation of post-disaster plans (Stanton-Geddes, Soz, and Bonte-Grapentin 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other things, this paper established how even in these relatively advanced countries cultural heritage is left out in risk management planning and strategies (Bonazza et al 2018). Stanton-Geddes, Soz, and Bonte-Grapentin's 2017 Promoting Disaster Resilient Cultural Heritage also used the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 in proffering the following pointers for the protection of cultural heritage: the establishment of appropriate laws, policies, and institutional frameworks; the continuous understanding of risks; the reduction of risks and building of capacities; and the preparation of post-disaster plans (Stanton-Geddes, Soz, and Bonte-Grapentin 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural heritage has always been an integral part of human societies, and it is thus important to protect and conserve it (Stanton‐Geddes and Soz, 2017). The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) 2015–2030 highlights the need to protect cultural heritage as a crucial component of investing in disaster resilience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historic districts typically function as both residential and commercial areas and are exposed to the same natural hazard risks. The study of how to increase the resilience of human settlements has become an important area of study in recent decades, as not only can disasters cause widespread destruction and casualties, but they can also damage or destroy the built cultural heritage of a society (Stanton‐Geddes and Soz, 2017). Cultural heritage is particularly threatened by earthquakes (UNESCO, 2010), and several high‐profile sites were recently reported to have been damaged (Marahatta, 2012; Kobayashi, 2014; Valencia, 2015; Takai et al, 2016; Yagi et al, 2016; Yunxia and Prott, 2016; Cheloni et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural heritage is broadly classified as either tangible, i.e., consisting of buildings, historic places, monuments etc., or intangible, i.e., referring to oral traditions, performing arts, social practices, rituals etc. (Stanton-Geddes and Soz, 2017). Henceforth the term cultural heritage will refer to tangible cultural heritage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, cultural heritage is a significant damage hotspot for natural hazards in which (i) the direct tangible losses can be irreversible or might take decades to be repaired, (ii) the intangible losses, i.e., historical, spiritual, aesthetic, and social values affected, often lead to indirect economic losses, including loss of livelihoods (Stanton-Geddes and Soz, 2017;Appiotti et al, 2020). Although valuing cultural heritage is possible through principles of applied economy such as the travel cost method, hedonic price method or willingness to pay (Navrud and Ready, 2002;Del Saz Salazar and Montagud Marques, 2005;Sayce et al, 2009;Bajçinovci and Thaçi, 2016;Voltaire et al, 2017), the value obtained is not suitable to determine a restoration or reconstruction cost usually adopted in flood damage assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%