2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting electrocatalytic overall water splitting with nanohybrid of transition metal nitride-oxynitride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Co(OH) 2 @HOS/CP electrode, a cell voltage of 1.631 V is needed to achieve the current density of 10 mA cm −2 in 1 m KOH in the absence of methanol. In fact, this potential is lower than those of recently reported Co‐based electrodes for overall water splitting, such as cobalt nitridevanadium oxynitride nanohybrid (1.64 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), cobalt iron hydroxide (1.64 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), 3D Co(OH) 2 @NCNTs@NF (1.72 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), Co(OH) 2 –Au–Ni(OH) 2 (1.75 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), and CoO x (OH) y /C nanocomposites (1.80 V for 10 mA cm −2 ) . Interestingly, the LSV curve of MFO coupled with HER dramatically shifts to more negative potentials, and the cell voltage is reduced to 1.497 V at the current density of 10 mA cm −2 , suggesting much better energy conversion efficiency by replacing OER with MFO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the case of Co(OH) 2 @HOS/CP electrode, a cell voltage of 1.631 V is needed to achieve the current density of 10 mA cm −2 in 1 m KOH in the absence of methanol. In fact, this potential is lower than those of recently reported Co‐based electrodes for overall water splitting, such as cobalt nitridevanadium oxynitride nanohybrid (1.64 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), cobalt iron hydroxide (1.64 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), 3D Co(OH) 2 @NCNTs@NF (1.72 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), Co(OH) 2 –Au–Ni(OH) 2 (1.75 V for 10 mA cm −2 ), and CoO x (OH) y /C nanocomposites (1.80 V for 10 mA cm −2 ) . Interestingly, the LSV curve of MFO coupled with HER dramatically shifts to more negative potentials, and the cell voltage is reduced to 1.497 V at the current density of 10 mA cm −2 , suggesting much better energy conversion efficiency by replacing OER with MFO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Further, the OER performances of MoS 2 /NiS 2 -3 are competitive among the current noble-metal-free catalysts (Table S2, Supporting Information). [40] The chronopotentiometric curve of MoS 2 /NiS 2 -3 electrode in Figure S9b in the Supporting Information shows no obvious changes in every step, suggesting the good conductivity, excellent mass transport, and mechanical properties in OER tests. It indicates that the MoS 2 /NiS 2 -3 proceeds a faster OER kinetic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[40] The chronopotentiometric curve of MoS 2 /NiS 2 -3 electrode in Figure S9b in the Supporting Information shows no obvious changes in every step, suggesting the good conductivity, excellent mass transport, and mechanical properties in OER tests. [40,41] To investigate the stability for OER, a long-time chronopotentiometry measurement was carried out at 10 and 50 mA cm −2 . The C dl of 6.32 mF cm −2 on MoS 2 /NiS 2 -3 is much higher than that of pure NiS 2 (2.70 mF cm −2 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, its half reactions, especially the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER), suffer from sluggish electron‐transfer kinetics that lead to low‐efficiency energy conversion . Precious‐metal‐based electrocatalysts exhibit the highest catalytic activity to reduce the overpotential requirement, but the high cost, scarcity and low stability of these catalysts have hindered their widespread application greatly . Therefore, substantial efforts have been devoted to develop highly efficient and inexpensive materials by reducing the noble metal usage or by exploring viable alternatives .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Precious-metal-based electrocatalysts exhibit the highest catalytic activity to reduce the overpotential requirement, but the high cost, scarcity and low stabilityo ft hesec atalysts have hindered their widespread application greatly. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Therefore, substantial efforts have been devotedt od evelop highly efficient and inexpensive materials by reducing the noblem etal usage or by exploring viable alternatives. [7,8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] There are two common approaches to enhance the activity of an electrocatalyst: ( 1) by increasing the quality of each active site (e.g.,n ormally by modulating the electronic configuration) and (2) by increasing the number of active sites at as pecific mass loading and electrode area (e.g., by engineering the structure and morphology to expose more active sites).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%