2017
DOI: 10.5897/ajar2017.12449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting micro, small and medium enterprises in beekeeping in Zambias Central Province: Making a case for the adoption of business incubation strategy

Abstract: Beekeeping has been a thriving enterprise among farmers in selected parts of Zambia. However, despite its enormous potential for transforming rural communities and through income generation, the beekeeping sector has experienced stunted growth for many years (or has not experienced meaningful growth for many years). Therefore, this study investigates the nature of beekeeping in selected parts of Zambia's Central Province in order to identify the challenges being faced and the possibility of establishing a busi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common answers were related to beekeeping inputs (n 5 8), finance (n 5 4), knowledge (n 5 4) and markets (n 5 2). Limited access to finance and/or inputs has been commonly reported in studies assessing the viability for beekeeping enterprises to improve livelihoods (Carroll and Kinsella, 2013; Financial support services for beekeepers Hamauswa et al, 2017;Minja and Nkumilwa, 2016;Wagner et al, 2019). An alternate explanation could be a reluctance to reinvest into these activities despite the potential to increase production, as hypothesised by one key informant; "people do not reinvest in their [beekeeping] business so it takes a downward trajectory, [the] business fails" (KI 22).…”
Section: Jadee 122mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common answers were related to beekeeping inputs (n 5 8), finance (n 5 4), knowledge (n 5 4) and markets (n 5 2). Limited access to finance and/or inputs has been commonly reported in studies assessing the viability for beekeeping enterprises to improve livelihoods (Carroll and Kinsella, 2013; Financial support services for beekeepers Hamauswa et al, 2017;Minja and Nkumilwa, 2016;Wagner et al, 2019). An alternate explanation could be a reluctance to reinvest into these activities despite the potential to increase production, as hypothesised by one key informant; "people do not reinvest in their [beekeeping] business so it takes a downward trajectory, [the] business fails" (KI 22).…”
Section: Jadee 122mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased density and diversity of pollinators has a direct impact on crop productivity and can help smallholder farmers increase their productivity by a global average of 24%. It has positive social impacts [13] and a significant impact on biodiversity [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beekeeping is associated with higher willingness to support native pollinators [20]. Presently, research is being carried out on the resistance of bees to disease, fertilizers, and other adverse influences reducing bee populations, including economic impacts [16,21,22]. In 2016, the International Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) warned, in a global integrated assessment of systemic insecticides, about the decline of pollinators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%