2022
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202202522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Promoting Surface Reconstruction of NiFe Layered Double Hydroxide for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution

Abstract: A dynamic surface reconstruction of oxide electrocatalysts in alkaline media is widely observed especially for layered double hydroxide (LDH), but little is known about how to promote the reconstruction toward desired surfaces for improved oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Here, surface reconstruction of NiFe LDH nanosheets is successfully induced to a higher degree via in situ sulfur doping than that by natural electrochemical activation. Theoretical calculations, operando Raman, and various ex situ characteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
87
0
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The generated S–Ni x Fe y OOH can optimize the intermediate adsorption and facilitate the reaction kinetics during the OER process. [ 39,40 ] Notably, the catalytic performances of S–NiFe LDH and Pt@S–NiFe LDH are comparable, indicating that Pt nanodots did not enhance OER catalysis. The Ir@S–NiFe LDH exhibits poor catalytic activity compared to the initial S–NiFe LDH (Figure S9b, Supporting Information), suggesting that this deposition method cannot be extended to Ir.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generated S–Ni x Fe y OOH can optimize the intermediate adsorption and facilitate the reaction kinetics during the OER process. [ 39,40 ] Notably, the catalytic performances of S–NiFe LDH and Pt@S–NiFe LDH are comparable, indicating that Pt nanodots did not enhance OER catalysis. The Ir@S–NiFe LDH exhibits poor catalytic activity compared to the initial S–NiFe LDH (Figure S9b, Supporting Information), suggesting that this deposition method cannot be extended to Ir.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, S and Fe atoms reduce the H adsorption energy on the S–Fe–Ni surface. For the OER process, S-doped NiFe hydroxyl oxide converted from the S–Fe–Ni catalyst has strong OH − adsorption, 72 and the in situ formed interface of S–Fe–Ni and derived NiFe hydroxyl oxide could facilitate the deprotonation of *OH and stabilize the *OOH intermediate, thus enhancing alkaline OER performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S38a†), which corresponded to the M–O bending and stretching vibrations of M III –OOH (M: Ni, Fe). 42,50,51 This indicates that Ni–OH is transformed into NiOOH at an applied potential of 1.4 V vs. RHE and above. In the specific polarization potential interval (1.45 V to 1.6 V), O 2 bubbles appeared on the surface of Ni(Fe)OOH/Ni(Fe)S x , and the vibrational bands of Raman spectra did not show significant shifts, demonstrating that the M–OOH evolved at the applied potential of 1.4 V vs. RHE is the active phase for catalytic O 2 evolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%