2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35166-3_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PRONOM: Proof-Search and Countermodel Generation for Non-normal Modal Logics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally we wish to study the formal relation with other recent calculi in the literature such as [4,13] in the form of mutual simulation. We also think of implementing our calculi and comparing them with the theorem prover proposed recently in [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally we wish to study the formal relation with other recent calculi in the literature such as [4,13] in the form of mutual simulation. We also think of implementing our calculi and comparing them with the theorem prover proposed recently in [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of the calculi for extensions of E is very similar:given the modularity of the calculi LSE * [5], each system is obtained by just adding clauses for both the predicates terminating_proof _search and build_saturate_branch corresponding to the axioms/rules specifically tailored for the extensions under consideration. However, with the exceptions of two files 4 containing some utilities and the definitions of the connectives, that are common to all the systems, we provide a different Prolog file for each system of the cube. This choice is justified by two reasons: first of all readiness of the code: one may be interested only in one specific system, wishing to have all the rules in a stand-alone file.…”
Section: Extensions Of Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have compared the performance of HYPNO with those of the prover PRONOM [5], which deals with the same set of logics, obtaining promising results. We have tested it by running SWI-Prolog, version 7.6.4, on an Apple MacBook Pro, 2.7 GHz Intel Core i7, 8 GB RAM machine.…”
Section: Performance Of Hypnomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11] it is presented a Prolog implementation of a NNML containing both the [∀∀] and the [∃∀] modality; its [∃∀] fragment coincides with the logic EM, also covered by HYPNO. Finally in [5] it is presented PRONOM, a theorem prover for the whole range of NNMLs, which implements labelled sequent calculi in [6]; PRONOM provides both proofs and countermodels in the mentioned bi-neighbourhood semantics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%