1936
DOI: 10.2307/2911614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proof-Reading in the Sixteenth, Seventeenth, and Eighteenth Centuries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Copyright laws are largely an eighteenth-century invention (Rose 1993;Woodmansee and Jaszi 1994). Similarly, careful editing of books (a process that was difficult at best in handwritten manuscripts and not widely practiced in the early days of printing -Price 1939;Simpson 1935) became the norm only in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Moreover, emerging copyright laws included the presumption that unless you were writing fiction, what you wrote was true.…”
Section: Durability Of a Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright laws are largely an eighteenth-century invention (Rose 1993;Woodmansee and Jaszi 1994). Similarly, careful editing of books (a process that was difficult at best in handwritten manuscripts and not widely practiced in the early days of printing -Price 1939;Simpson 1935) became the norm only in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Moreover, emerging copyright laws included the presumption that unless you were writing fiction, what you wrote was true.…”
Section: Durability Of a Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jahrhunderts im ernestinischen Herzogtum Sachsen-Altenburg bzw. im albertinischen Kurfürstentum Sachsen tätig war: Soviel hatten unabhängig voneinander sowohlSimpson (1935) 301 als auchClemen (1940) 302 korrekt erschlossen. Ungeachtet dessen hat Cerquiglini, der doch in Simpsons Buch die Reproduktion des Holzschnitts samt der Nennung Thyms in der lateinischen Bildbeschreibung vor sich hatte, behauptet, der Holzschnitt sei von "Holbein": Dies stellt der Intensität seines Interesses an Fragen der frühneuzeitlichen Autorschaft kein günstiges Zeugnis aus.Der I n h a l t von Hornschuchs kurzer Abhandlung stimmt denn auch denkbar schlecht zu dem, was Cerquiglini in den der Abhandlung programmatisch vorangestellten Holzschnitt von Moses Thym hineinprojiziert hat.…”
unclassified