1953
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(53)80085-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of turbulent flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since (1) d t is known to grow in time (Atashkari et al, 1999;Renou et al, 2002) and (2) this quantity was not provided in most of the analyzed experiments, we had to invoke a submodel for d t (t). An analysis of numerous published data on d t , discussed in our recent papers (Lipatnikov andChomiak, 2001, 2002a), supports the classical hypothesis (Karlovitz et al, 1951;Prudnikov, 1964;Scurlock and Grover, 1953) that the development of flame brush thickness in many laboratory flames follows the turbulent diffusion law (Brodkey, 1967;Taylor, 1935) …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Since (1) d t is known to grow in time (Atashkari et al, 1999;Renou et al, 2002) and (2) this quantity was not provided in most of the analyzed experiments, we had to invoke a submodel for d t (t). An analysis of numerous published data on d t , discussed in our recent papers (Lipatnikov andChomiak, 2001, 2002a), supports the classical hypothesis (Karlovitz et al, 1951;Prudnikov, 1964;Scurlock and Grover, 1953) that the development of flame brush thickness in many laboratory flames follows the turbulent diffusion law (Brodkey, 1967;Taylor, 1935) …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The problem of flame-generated turbulence was posed by Karlovitz et al (1951) and Scurlock & Grover (1953) in order to attribute high values of S t measured in early experiments to an increase in u within flame brushes when compared to u in upstream flows. Karlovitz et al (1951) argued that, because of the random orientation of flame fronts, the local velocity jumps |(u b − u u ) · n| increase the magnitude u = |u −ū|/ √ 3 of velocity fluctuations in products.…”
Section: Flame-generated Turbulence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, Karlovitz et al (1951) associated flame-generated turbulence with flow acceleration by the local pressure drop δp f at flame fronts. Scurlock & Grover (1953) highlighted (a) the creation of transverse shear in the flow of burned products within a flame brush due to uneven axial flow acceleration by the mean pressure gradient ∇p and (b) turbulence generation by the shear flow. Because the acceleration of a fluid particle Du/Dt ∝ ρ −1 ∇p is inversely proportional to its density, the same pressure gradient accelerates low-density products more strongly than heavier unburned gas.…”
Section: Flame-generated Turbulence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conceptually, the simplest way to distort an anchored premixed flame is to introduce some upstream perturbation that can be described as a kinematic process (Scurlock and Grover, 1953;Boyer and Quinard, 1990), but intrinsic flame dynamics can interfere with this process (Clavin, 1985;Searby et al, 1985) to select the structures having the maximum growth rate and to wrinkle the flame front with a characteristic scale (Yoshida, 1986;Hertzberg et al, 1991). There is thus also some interest in laminar flame experiments where these intrinsic properties only are observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%