“…molecular size, chemical structure, functionalities, extent of release from the thickener film and sublimation, thermal stability, degree of penetration or diffusion coefficient along with mode of interaction, fixation and retention within the modified blend components, via hydrogen-bonding, Van der Waal's forces, dipole interactions and/or formation of inclusion compounds with the grafted MCT-b-CD on modified fabric samples (Aspland, 1997;Buschmann et al, 1998;Choudhury, 2006;Szejtli, 2003), (iv) pre-modification step has practically no harsh effect on the obtained prints-handle, (v) the outstanding UV-protection properties of the obtained prints, expressed as, UPF value, are governed by the treatment sequence, i.e. pretreatment with MCT-b-CD followed by disperse printing > disperse printing only without pre-modification > untreated, as well as the structure of the disperse dye molecules its ability to absorb the hazardous UV-radiation, especially UV-B along with the bonds between dye-molecules with blend components, (Gorensek & Slnga, 2004;Ibrahim, Refai, Youssef, & Ahmed, 2005) (vi) the high UPF value of untreated blend fabric reflects the positive role of polyester component with its aromatic units on exhibiting a high absorption of UV-B radiation along with the good UV-absorption properties of the wool component, (Gorensek and Slnga, 2004;Ibrahim et al, 2005) (vii) the modified fabric samples, functionalized with MCT-b-CD, exhibits higher UV-protecting capacities compared to the unmodified or untreated ones, suggesting the formation of the host-guest inclusion complex between the MCT-b-CD fixed at and/or within the finish/wool matrix and the hydrophobic disperse dye molecules, and the ability of the formed complex to act as a highly efficient UV-filter, (Ibrahim et al, 2008;Gorensek and Slnga, 2004;Ibrahim et al, 2005) and (viii) darker depth of shades, i.e. higher K/S values, significantly improve the UPF values, regardless of the used disperse dye.…”