Encapsulation Technologies and Delivery Systems for Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals 2012
DOI: 10.1533/9780857095909.4.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties and applications of different probiotic delivery systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the ME% for all the alginate-tannin systems studied in this work was very low (<16%). For this reason, alginate is mainly used as a delivery vehicle for large bioactive agents such as cells or probiotics, although in some cases this polymer has again proved to be scarcely efficient ( Krasaekoopt and Bhandari, 2012 ). To mitigate these defects, the blending with other compounds or coating the microbeads is often necessary, especially when trying to entrap water-soluble and small bioactive compounds ( Krasaekoopt and Bhandari, 2012 ; Mohammadi et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the ME% for all the alginate-tannin systems studied in this work was very low (<16%). For this reason, alginate is mainly used as a delivery vehicle for large bioactive agents such as cells or probiotics, although in some cases this polymer has again proved to be scarcely efficient ( Krasaekoopt and Bhandari, 2012 ). To mitigate these defects, the blending with other compounds or coating the microbeads is often necessary, especially when trying to entrap water-soluble and small bioactive compounds ( Krasaekoopt and Bhandari, 2012 ; Mohammadi et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…calcium), which crosslink the G blocks, yielding an egg-box structure ( Stokke et al, 2000 ). However, beads prepared with alginate present some drawbacks, such as high biomolecular leakage rate, low mechanical strength and large pore size ( Krasaekoopt and Bhandari, 2012 ). Due to the pore size, probiotics ( Gómez-Mascaraque et al, 2018 ) or cells ( Qiao et al, 2014 ) are better encapsulated than smaller molecules, such as some polyphenols, whose encapsulation efficiency has been reported to be low ( Goh et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freeze-drying process gives a more porous structure to encapsulated probiotics, resulting in poor barrier effects [ 138 ]. With a large air–solid interface area, the faster death rate of probiotics has been reported during storage [ 139 ]. However, the addition of nanoparticles during the freeze-drying process is known to increase the viability of encapsulated probiotics.…”
Section: Techniques Used For Encapsulation Of Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average size of the bead was insignificantly different, ranging from 0.57 to 0.8 cm. Krasaekoopt and Bhandari (36) argued that the bead size and shape could be controlled by adjusting the dropping distance, needle diameter, and properties of the matrix solution. In this study, all of the mentioned conditions were not varied, except the property of the glucomannan used as matrix solution.…”
Section: Size and Appearance Of Iron Fresh Beadsmentioning
confidence: 99%