2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties and biodegradability of chitosan/nylon 11 blending films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no significant shift in the diffraction peaks was observed, indicating that the presence of chitosan did not affect the ordered structure of PEO but only limited the nucleation process (Mucha et al, 1999;Peesan, Supaphol, & Rujiravanit, 2005). Similarly, chitosan has been reported to retard the crystallinity of films made of cellulose (Isogai & Atalla, 1992), poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid) (Ikejima & Inoue, 2000), nylon 11 (Kuo, Sahu, & Yu, 2006), polycaprolactone (Sarasam, Krishnaswamy, & Madihally, 2006), and poly(vinyl alcohol) (Chen, Wang, Mao, & Yang, 2007). This may be explained by that the chitosan molecular chains affected the overall mobility of polymers in the blend and impeded the rate of crystal growth (Zhao, Yu, Zhong, Zhang, & Sun, 1995).…”
Section: Film Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, no significant shift in the diffraction peaks was observed, indicating that the presence of chitosan did not affect the ordered structure of PEO but only limited the nucleation process (Mucha et al, 1999;Peesan, Supaphol, & Rujiravanit, 2005). Similarly, chitosan has been reported to retard the crystallinity of films made of cellulose (Isogai & Atalla, 1992), poly(3-hydroxybutyric acid) (Ikejima & Inoue, 2000), nylon 11 (Kuo, Sahu, & Yu, 2006), polycaprolactone (Sarasam, Krishnaswamy, & Madihally, 2006), and poly(vinyl alcohol) (Chen, Wang, Mao, & Yang, 2007). This may be explained by that the chitosan molecular chains affected the overall mobility of polymers in the blend and impeded the rate of crystal growth (Zhao, Yu, Zhong, Zhang, & Sun, 1995).…”
Section: Film Crystallizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The self‐assembly between gluten and chitosan template resulted in an amorphous/crystalline phase transition whose intensity was dependent on the protein:chitosan ratio used (Figure a), displaying two main reflections at 2θ 10.4° and 19.8°, being clearly observed a new reflection at 2θ = 22.0° for the gluten–chitosan supramolecular assembly formed at 1.9:1 protein to chitosan ratio. Higher crystallinity was also observed for this ratio, demonstrating a better long‐range ordering, which decreased for the 1.3:1 ratio. In order to extract the major sources of variation in the crystallinity structure of the gluten–chitosan supramolecular assemblies, a principal component analysis was performed (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cs1‐Ms has been known to degrade slowly because of high crystallization in its net‐work structure. Numerous degradation studies of chitosan matrixes have been conducted examining different formulations and timescales 40, 41. As with many nonsoluble polysaccharides, chitosan undergoes bulk degradation through hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous degradation studies of chitosan matrixes have been conducted examining different formulations and timescales. 40,41 As with many nonsoluble polysaccharides, chitosan undergoes bulk degradation through hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond. This form of random chain scission at the glycosidic bond allows maintenance of the network structure, but results in a decrease in mechanical strength of the bulk matrix.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%