2009
DOI: 10.2478/v10147-010-0050-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties and Performance of Hard Coatings on Tool Steels under Cyclic Indentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Bhowmick et al , 36 the edge cracks are the result of stretching of top membrane of the coating influenced by plastic deformation of the substrate as well as additional bending effects on the surface layer at the edge of the indentation impression. It is reported by Sivitski et al , 20 that the brittle coatings (nanocomposite) fail in tensile driven cracking mode while the tougher coatings (TiN) would fail in quasi-plastic or shear cracking mode, which support the present findings.…”
Section: Semsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Bhowmick et al , 36 the edge cracks are the result of stretching of top membrane of the coating influenced by plastic deformation of the substrate as well as additional bending effects on the surface layer at the edge of the indentation impression. It is reported by Sivitski et al , 20 that the brittle coatings (nanocomposite) fail in tensile driven cracking mode while the tougher coatings (TiN) would fail in quasi-plastic or shear cracking mode, which support the present findings.…”
Section: Semsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It has been observed 20 that TiN with higher E / H ratio performs better during cyclic indentation tests than nc-TiAlN/a-Si 3 N 4 nanocomposite with lower E / H ratio. On the contrary, a reverse trend was reported by Chen et al 21 for coatings with similar chemistry during cyclic nanoimpact tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same tendencies can be seen in the indentational response of the coating systems being studied, along with impact wear and indentation surface fatigue behavior [25][26][27]. The nACo and nACRo coatings reveal lower coating failed area ratios (FR, %) when they are compared to TiCN, at a level of 24-42% for 10 3 and 5 × 10 6 for the of impact figures, respectively [27].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…According to them, crystalline films are more brittle than the amorphous films. In converse, Sivitski et al [33] have reported that TiN has performed better than the nanocomposite coating during nanoindentation tests. Argon [34] report that, during plastic deformation in nanocrystalline or amorphous materials, localised shear transformations takes place within a few nanometers range at low strain rates (typical of nanoindentation) while at high strain rates (typical of cyclic nanoimpact test), catastrophic growth of micro- and nano-cracks lead to their brittle fracture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%