2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2009.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of CuInxGa1−xSe2 thin films grown from electrodeposited precursors with different levels of selenium content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still the process will not be a viable one for large scale production of the film. Polycrystalline CIGS thin film absorbers were prepared by selenizing electrodeposited precursors (Kang et al, 2010). In this two different levels of selenium contents were prepared and the performance characteristics were compared.…”
Section: The Difficulty In Scaling Up Of the Existing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still the process will not be a viable one for large scale production of the film. Polycrystalline CIGS thin film absorbers were prepared by selenizing electrodeposited precursors (Kang et al, 2010). In this two different levels of selenium contents were prepared and the performance characteristics were compared.…”
Section: The Difficulty In Scaling Up Of the Existing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of this, the present section will only update the recent work done in this area, so as not to duplicate the recently published work. In the recent development, Kang et al [150] have prepared CIGS absorber by selenizing electrodeposited precursor with rich Se and poor Se content. The Se-poor electrodeposited precursor had better crystallinity and increased Ga content.…”
Section: Nonvacuum-based Approach Vacuum-evaporated Polycrystallinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of electrodeposition technique to fabricate CIS-based films generally results in rough surface and poor crystalline structure with small crystal size. The surface morphology of electrodeposited films usually shows cauliflower-like, triangular, or round structures, or irregular growth [19][20][21][22]. This feature is attributed to growth phases and stoichiometry, but is more difficult to control during the electrodeposition process compared with the vacuum-produced process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%