1979
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of microfilled and visible light-cured composite resins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Composite restoratives, especially for the anterior teeth, require superior esthetic quality. Microfilled resin composites have been used for esthetic restorations, despite their lower mechanical properties 28,29) . Recently, many available composites are categorized as the hybrid type and manufacturers indicate their use for both the anterior and posterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite restoratives, especially for the anterior teeth, require superior esthetic quality. Microfilled resin composites have been used for esthetic restorations, despite their lower mechanical properties 28,29) . Recently, many available composites are categorized as the hybrid type and manufacturers indicate their use for both the anterior and posterior teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 A positive correlation has been established between the hardness and the inorganic filler content of dental restorative composites. 44,45 Increased filler levels result in increased hardness numbers. 6,9 This phenomenon is quite complex, resulting from an interaction of multiple factors associated with the resin matrix and the filler particles, including particle size and distribution.…”
Section: Vickers Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A spherical shape will improve the filling effects of Cry820C. 9,[15][16][17] Moreover, the lower elastic moduli of Cry820C (7.7 ± 0.2 GPa) and Cry850C (7.3 ± 0.3 GPa) compared with that of AWC (9.9 ± 0.1 GPa) are believed to be beneficial because an even stress distribution or load transmission between the prosthesis and bone is expected. 11,14,23 Although Cry820C and Cry850C were expected to exhibit differences in osteoconductivity, both composites behaved almost the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%