Property Sector Financialization: The Case of Swiss Pension Funds (1992–2005)

Abstract

Financialization is a major trend in Western economies. This paper shows, on the one hand, how it changes the management criteria and, on the other hand, the limits to financialization in the property sector. Between 1992 and 2004, about 15% of Swiss pension funds’ wealth was invested in property. As far as their investment policy is concerned, pension funds have two choices. First, they can directly own, and have management responsibility for, the properties in their portfolios. Alternatively, they can buy shares in mainly Zurich-based investment vehicles. In the first case, pension funds require staff with the relevant expertise along with the knowledge of property markets. Investments have a regional focus and are assessed internally by the funds. In the second case, pension funds are merely investors and investment appraisals and comparisons are made on the basis of market criteria such as yield, diversification in relation to risk and liquidity. In this case, property investments focus solely on the country’s main urban areas.Finance Industry, Territorial Economy, Swiss Pension Funds

From urban wastelands to new‐build gentrification: The case of Swiss cities

“…With the drop in stock prices in 2002, property regained attractiveness for its stable rate of return and as a risk diversifi cation strategy. The emergence of an indirect channel in property investment also contributed to this process (Theurillat et al, 2006). Although actors such as pension funds traditionally own residential buildings, they started privileging indirect channels by acquiring shares in property funds that took on the production or acquisition of housing units.…”

The real estate markets: Players, institutions and territories

“…Real estate, and more specifically the transformation of the urban landscape through major projects, seems to be a key area of interest within one of the dominant literatures of urban studies, the so-called "actually existing neoliberalism" (Brenner and Theodore, 2002). Similarly, a growing number of writers are examining the interdependent connections between real estate and finance, taking account of a wide range of territorial situations from an institutionalist perspective (Aveline-Dubach, 2008;Theurillat et al, 2010;Theurillat, 2011a and b;Theurillat andCrevoisier, 2012 and2013) or a socio-economic perspective (Torrance, 2009;David and Halbert, 2013). These works underline the need to deal with the issue of built environment production in the light of the links between land ownership, finance or even public policy, and the need to stop putting real estate "under a bell jar in order to examine it more closely" (Aveline-Dubach, 2008: 13).…”

The Impact of Institutional Investors on Corporate Governance: A View of Swiss Pension Funds in a Changing Financial Environment

“…The privatization wave in Europe of state-controlled companies in the 1990s allowed the listing of these companies on the stock markets and the growth of the latter. The finance industry expanded into new sectors of activity, such as property markets (Theurillat et al 2006b) or urban infrastructures (Torrance 2006) too. Today, finance, the current dominant institutional form, can be seen as controlling the forms and the pace of accumulation.…”

“…However, investors are less and less familiar with the new countries in which investments are made. Furthermore, with the emergence of new sectors, such as real estate (Theurillat et al 2006b) or urban infrastructures (Torrance 2006), new skills are needed in relation to traditional industrial investments Finally, in common with most other business sectors, the finance industry's products and services are simultaneously undergoing a process of both standardisation and innovation/complexification. However, new products (derivative products, composite products, etc.)…”