Property Titling and Conveyancing

Arruñada, Benito

doi:10.2139/ssrn.1154063

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Queensland, Australia, the implementation of ELC faced strong resistance initially because the government performed public communication measly, and the resistance mainly came from the legal practitioner and conservatism [7]. In 2009, the transformation from manual to electronic submission in the Torrens system (a land titling system established in South Australia in 1958 and adopted throughout Australia and New Zealand, which records and registers land interests and land ownership) in New Zealand also met a relatively high repudiation at the beginning [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public Acceptance of Electronic Land Certificate

Purbawa,

Prihatin,

Wicaksono

et al. 2023

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the frame of e-government, the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency recently issued an electronic land certificate policy through ministerial regulation number 1 of 2021 concerning electronic certificates. Since this is a relatively new policy and its acceptance level is still unidentified, this paper is aimed to measure the public acceptance index of the electronic land certificate by conducting an online survey in DKI Jakarta Province because it is included as one of the pilot projects provinces for the policy implementation. This research is a quantitative study, and the primary data were collected by conducting an online survey using the questionnaire; however, only 101 out of 1,625 respondents answered the survey questionnaire. Data comprised 48 respondents in the control group and 53 in the treatment group. We further estimated the effect of attaching detailed information about the electronic land certificate in the questionnaire on the acceptance level using coarsened exact matching. The acceptance level in DKI Jakarta is relatively high; it is 3.33, 3.40, and 3.47 (1 to 5 Likert scale) for each statement of acceptance. We found that attaching detailed information about the electronic land certificate in the questionnaire has no significant effect on its acceptance. We suggest the government should consider not only the readiness of the internal aspect but al-so the public acceptance, and it is necessary to measure the public acceptance of the policy in other provinces to enlarge the observations because public acceptance reflects the size of the benefits derived from the electronic land certificate policy.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%