2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophylaxis for Stress Ulcers With Proton Pump Inhibitors Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Bloodstream Infections in the Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: Background & Aims Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with increased risk of infection, likely due to changes in intestinal epithelial permeability and the gastrointestinal microbiome. PPIs are frequently given to patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent stress ulcers. These patients are at risk for bloodstream infections (BSIs), so we investigated the relationship between PPI use and BSIs among patients in the ICU. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Pneumonia was the most common infections in this study, which might due to the higher incidence of acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (75-82%) in the study and the treatment of mechanical ventilation. Similar results also showed that PPI inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit 23 . Although the actual clinical problems were not serious, the theoretical risk of SIBO/DBO or SAP aggravation due to duodenal dysbiosis remains not to be ignored.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Pneumonia was the most common infections in this study, which might due to the higher incidence of acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (75-82%) in the study and the treatment of mechanical ventilation. Similar results also showed that PPI inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit 23 . Although the actual clinical problems were not serious, the theoretical risk of SIBO/DBO or SAP aggravation due to duodenal dysbiosis remains not to be ignored.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Animal studies indicate that both TGR5 and FXR contribute to the integrity of the intestinal barrier (32, 48, 69, 94). Alternatively, some bile acids exert direct, receptor-independent toxicity toward intestinal epithelial cells (34), based on the detergent properties of bile acids (149), induction of apoptosis (3), and induction of changes in tight junction proteins (171). Finally, some unconjugated bile acids may provoke colonic mucus secretion, probably through a direct action on mucus-secreting cells.…”
Section: Potential Of Dietary and Nondietary Factors To Impact Componmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, capsule endoscopy revealed exacerbation of NSAID-induced small bowel injury by a PPI (rabeprazole) in 57 healthy subjects (226). In contrast, use of a PPI was not associated with incidence of bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit (data from 24,774 patients), suggesting that PPIs do not meaningfully alter permeability (34).…”
Section: Potential Of Dietary and Nondietary Factors To Impact Componmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their release in the late 1980s, PPIs have become some of the most widely prescribed agents both in outpatient and inpatient settings throughout the world[ 44 - 53 ], with sales totalling billions dollars worldwide[ 54 , 55 ]. These drugs have proven effective in the treatment of ulcer disease (including bleeding peptic ulcer), gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori (in combination with antibiotics), Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, in the prophylaxis of upper gastrointestinal complications with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) therapy, stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients, and functional dyspepsia[ 50 , 53 , 56 - 60 ]. The widespread use of PPIs during the last 25 years in clinical practice is the result not only of their high efficacy but also of their excellent safety profile, proving to be one of the safest class of medication used in gastroenterology[ 57 , 61 - 64 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%